Please read

Never read it, no

I’m sorry, centralism is not up my alley

So much effort just for you

comrade!

If it floats your boat more power to you

Now you can read it both <#308951630328627200> and #english http://proriv.ru/articles.shtml?issue_62

I believe that we all have preferences and my preference is decentralized horizontal society that voluntarily organizes itself, and centralism really doesn’t connect with me

Is no matter what are your preferences but inability to organize a democratic party will lead to an ability to organize authoritarian.

But on the different note, I would enjoy banning the fash, if you can grant me that power, I will use it to our common advantage

If democratic party cant hold power, then we're sorry.

Oh, I am all for organizing democratic parties

I just don’t believe in *the only party* that is a vanguard of proletariat

Is like 2% of people support

I would love to have ten left wing parties competing for power

Is not necessary. We're not into competition.

With demsoc being considered right wing

Only cooperation.

Only one party is needed

Well, here I disagree again

Even Lenin has different fractions in his party

If you don't like to cooperate you have to compete.

We excluded factions in the end.

Is not time for factions.

Very small amount of people capable of democracy.

Most people are unjust, selfish and aggressive.

Most people don't know how to run the country

Why would you let people who don't know anything a government position?

Here lie our fundamental differences that we can’t bridge

Do you go to doctor who doesn't know how to do surgery?

@n- Democratic Socialism isn't right wing unless if you are talking about American "Democratic Socialism" which is just welfare capitalism.

Is a strong disagreement.

Multiple parties are a part of bourgeois democracy.

Proletarian democracy is achieved through worker councils.

And the partys task is to protect them, not control them.

@Volya~ you misunderstand - my ideal society would be one where demsocs are considered right wing because everyone shifted left

Oh.

Actually just refer to them as Welfare Capitalists.

I still think that even than you would have a spectrum of opinions, hence multiple parties

The word "socialist" doesnt fit their purposes.

You don't have to have a party for every opinion