The purging of hatred makes ideas like love meaningless

In honorable warfare, one does not hate their enemies, because their enemies are fellow warriors, just on the other side. Hatred became necessary when deception became introduced to war. Hatred became necessary when the people learned to love peace and could only be roused to fight by hating. That's why Hitler is so demonized: to justify the war waged by the Allies. They have to teach us to hate the "enemy" that they want us to fight, while we naturally hate (((their ilk))) for being such vile dens of vipers.

You don't think Hitler hated the Jews and communists?

That's just not true.

Jews are the worlds victims

Theyve literally lied about their entire history

And there is no such thing as "honorable warfare" unless by that you mean doing whatever it takes to win.

That's what I'm saying, we naturally hate them because they introduced deception and trickery to war and removed all honor from it

Guns took a lot of honor out of warfare

Indeed

If your enemy is deserving of respect and honorable treatment, then it is a dishonorable act to make war with him.

When Europeans fought Europeans, before the Jew came, there was honor and (probably) not hatred.

When you go to war, you should always behave like beasts, killing machines. There is no place for codes and treaties and "fair treatment." War means the death of your enemy, the destruction of his ability to ever challenge you agin, the erasure of his name and legacy from history. Anything less is not a victory.

https://youtu.be/-b_NVqt9oY8

Anything less than carnage and rape on the battlefield leads to more wars. These Codes of Honor" of which you speak enabled Lords and Kings to make war for their own advantage, whenever they felt like it. The people suffer then.

The wars we have now are a great example. So long as the casualties aren't too high, and they don't affect the populace of whichever side is winning to a substantial degree, the wars will never end.

That's true

There are certain codes that are different, like parleying under the white flag, but those are just ways to have an orderly war.

Yeah. The Geneva Convention is definitely bs tbh

The US gov certainly agrees. Despite being a signatory, we use the Geneva Convention accords as toilet paper. If that weren't the case, you'd never see a shotgun on the battlefield.

Ah, good old Victor's Justice. The thing that allows the US to do whatever the heck it wants, whether it's firebombing Germans or raping and burning Vietnamese children.

Vae Victis

https://youtu.be/EWA_lCjOb5Q

I don't speak ancient spaghetti nigger

I like that intro

Vae victis (IPA: [ˈwai ˈwiktiːs]) is Latin for "woe to the vanquished", or "woe to the conquered".[1] It means that those defeated in battle are entirely at the mercy of their conquerors and should not expect—or request—leniency.

True

It's just hypocritical for the Allies to criticize the Germans for "all those dead Jews" but not even think about apologizing for doing the same thing tenfold

It's beyond hypocritical since the holocaust didn't happen.

Exactly

It's just a straight up lie.

And the US gov knows this.

Even if it did happen, that wouldn't justify their actions. But that it didn't is beyond hypocrisy and deciet

It's funny how they go on and on about Russian propaganda now, but all that crap the USSR faked at the end of WWII is just fine.

yep

Savitri Devi talks about how she thinks it is regretful that Christians vanquished so many pagan religions, but it was really the Pagans' fault for not having Men In Time to act like lightning and defeating the Christians. If they had resisted more effectively, they could have won.

fuckin

Check out Nationalist Legion (@NL1488): https://twitter.com/NL1488?s=09

@Graham Is this you?