Message from @....

Discord ID: 313487457976975360


2017-05-15 01:15:12 UTC  

@Deleted User i'll bookmark it for later

2017-05-15 01:15:15 UTC  

ty

2017-05-15 01:15:29 UTC  

Ancap literally has the government get replaced by corporations, same thing tbh

2017-05-15 01:16:21 UTC  

@Mawk
Postmodernism can be summed up in one word: Deconstruction. What this means is that it's a framework of philosophy that questions and dismantles every single value system as a byproduct of history with no inherent merit. It's known now as Critical Theory.

2017-05-15 01:17:24 UTC  

@★ Commissar Regi ★
Difference between government and a business is that the government requires force, while a business requires the consumer's consent.

2017-05-15 01:17:25 UTC  

what would be an example of a value system?

2017-05-15 01:17:46 UTC  

does anyone have any clue of how one would hypothetically contact the IRPGF

2017-05-15 01:17:52 UTC  

Humanitarianism.
Utilitarianism.
Christian ethics.

2017-05-15 01:18:03 UTC  

ah ok

2017-05-15 01:18:04 UTC  

deontology

2017-05-15 01:18:11 UTC  

@Tʜᴇ Sᴛᴜᴅʏ ᴏғ Cʜᴀɴɢᴇ#1345 Corrrection: diamat is not metaphysics. It is scientific and objective.

2017-05-15 01:19:16 UTC  

@dontchewglass Why would you want to do something stupid like that?

2017-05-15 01:19:40 UTC  

@Deleted User
I argue otherwise, because it presupposes the naturalistic framework while dismissing the only verifiability that is subjective experience, i.e idealism:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2Fs13423-015-0890-8

2017-05-15 01:21:07 UTC  

@Tʜᴇ Sᴛᴜᴅʏ ᴏғ Cʜᴀɴɢᴇ#1345 " the only verifiability " Subjectvity verifies nothing. Logic and Reason do, which are not products of consciousness, but of the nervous system.

2017-05-15 01:22:24 UTC  

Do you call this document academic?

2017-05-15 01:22:29 UTC  

@Deleted User
Can you prove that? Is a materialistic framework more verifiable than a subjective one, where the only thing you're ever actually able to verify is your own direct experiential perception?

2017-05-15 01:22:33 UTC  
2017-05-15 01:24:24 UTC  

'Framework; is not necessary. Nor is verifiableness. If it were necessary for existance I would correctly attribute it to subjectivity.

2017-05-15 01:25:30 UTC  

Do I have to verify that the air is breathable?

2017-05-15 01:26:52 UTC  

@Deleted User
Logically speaking you can't prove that atoms and the void are all that exists when your mind is actually all you really have. I argue that it's not matter or energy that is the most fundamental, but information; defined simply as whatever subjective pattern that is.

2017-05-15 01:27:14 UTC  

@Deleted User
It's already self-evident as verification.

2017-05-15 01:29:01 UTC  

none of you are ubermensch, get out

2017-05-15 01:29:24 UTC  

Lel Nietzsche's Will to Power

2017-05-15 01:29:38 UTC  

My Willy has Power

2017-05-15 01:29:57 UTC  

Nietzche's guide to picking up women

2017-05-15 01:30:44 UTC  

This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end; a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself; as a whole, of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but likewise without increase or income; enclosed by "nothingness" as by a boundary; not something blurry or wasted, not something endlessly extended, but set in a definite space as a definite force, and not a sphere that might be "empty" here or there, but rather as force throughout, as a play of forces and waves of forces, at the same time one and many, increasing here and at the same time decreasing there; a sea of forces flowing and rushing together, eternally changing, eternally flooding back, with tremendous years of recurrence, with an ebb and a flood of its forms; out of the simplest forms striving toward the most complex, out of the stillest, most rigid, coldest forms toward the hottest, most turbulent, most self -contradictory, and then again returning home to the simple out of this abundance, out of the play of contradictions back to the joy of concord, still affirming itself in this uniformity of its courses and its years, blessing itself as that which must return eternally, as a becoming that knows no satiety, no disgust, no weariness: this, my Dionysian world of the eternally self -creating, the eternally self- destroying, this mystery world of the twofold voluptuous delight, my "beyond good and evil," without goal, unless the joy of the circle is itself a goal; without will, unless a ring feels good will toward itself--do you want a name for this world? A solution for all its riddles? A light for you, too, you best-concealed, strongest, most intrepid, most midnightly men?-- This world is the will to power— and nothing besides! And you yourselves are also this will to power— and nothing besides!

2017-05-15 01:31:13 UTC  

wiat

2017-05-15 01:31:17 UTC  

"monster"

2017-05-15 01:31:21 UTC  

"energy"?

2017-05-15 01:31:28 UTC  

Monster Energy?

2017-05-15 01:31:28 UTC  

Thanks for the sophistry, Descartes. You need language to express that, firstly. Language is formed by mechanisms in the body which are materialistic realities. The first thing you encounter in your mind is not the first thing only the most present.

2017-05-15 01:31:43 UTC  

I thought you weren't aloud to advertise sports drinks here

2017-05-15 01:31:55 UTC  

@Deleted User
@danman1950
That's an excerpt from Friedrich Nietzsche's Will to Power.

2017-05-15 01:32:12 UTC  

fuck you guys, i'm masterbating in my barrel

2017-05-15 01:33:50 UTC  

@Tʜᴇ Sᴛᴜᴅʏ ᴏғ Cʜᴀɴɢᴇ#1345 I know I wasted 4 years of my life studying that shit.

2017-05-15 01:34:31 UTC  

@Deleted User
Whoa. Is that what philosophy really is like? Armchair ramblings?

2017-05-15 01:36:02 UTC  

@Deleted User nope you did it wrong, you fap in a barrel.that's how you really do it

2017-05-15 01:37:13 UTC  

@Tʜᴇ Sᴛᴜᴅʏ ᴏғ Cʜᴀɴɢᴇ#1345 Yes. RUN.

2017-05-15 01:38:36 UTC  

@Deleted User
Thanks for the advice. xD

2017-05-15 01:40:29 UTC  

so was nietzsche a hack?

2017-05-15 01:40:54 UTC  

@Mawk
If you read many of his writings, he appears as such.