@Mawk
If you read many of his writings, he appears as such.

how come?

@Mawk
He was incredibly pretentious and speculative when formulating his existential philosophy. He didn't really formalize it, but he did conceive of ideas that were formulated previously.

ty

@Tʜᴇ Sᴛᴜᴅʏ ᴏғ Cʜᴀɴɢᴇ#1345 So where does language come from? Subjectivity?

@Zielgerät
My philosophy doesn't exclusively reduce down to solipsism. It's a more developed framework of idealism where, in this case, language would originate from systems of information. This is an epistemic realism position, although there are many variations of it that deal with the underlying metaphysics. The _basic_ idea is that the World is an interface. Call it a simulation if you may.

Sounds fancy but what is the difference between 'systems of information' and material reality?

Instead of Bit from It, you get It from Bit. This concept reduces all of material reality to code that could potentially be replicated on a quantum computer, and theoretical physicists today are using this Information-Theoretic approach as a replacement for this previous spacetime-centric worldview, which was significantly more constrained. They've managed instead to reduce things to a more basic level, where networks and relations are actually more fundamental than the objects they are allegedly derived from.

Why go to that effort? Do you enjoy being a special snowflake?

@Deleted User
Well no. This is simply a novel view of the world that could actually yield more fruit than our current materialistic framework that puts everything in a box rather than seeing nature as it is. I plan on learning more about physics through this approach, as it's what many physicists have explained could lead to the Theory of Everything, reconciling quantum mechanics with general relativity. Our current framework isn't capable of doing that; but this one aims to do so: http://www.quantumgravityresearch.org/publications

This seems like optimistic preference rather than a 'denial of diamat'. Can you summerize?

We can finish there.

20th century is materialism.
21st century is informational realism.

I leave it at that, lol.

I don't see the dichotomoy.

Both are scientific.

Has anyone looked at this? http://www.anti-dialectics.co.uk/

Rosa Lichtenstein is a “Wittgensteinian Trotskyist”

Is that a mental illness?

Diamat doesn't wor-

http://i3.cpcache.com/merchandise/90_350x350_Front_Color-White.png?region={%22id%22:3330625,%22name%22:%22FrontCenter%22,%22width%22:9.75,%22height%22:3.25,%22orientation%22:0,%22crop_x%22:0.0,%22crop_y%22:0.0,%22crop_w%22:1950.0,%22crop_h%22:650.0,%22scale%22:0.9285714,%22dpi%22:200,%22template%22:{%22id%22:3330625,%22params%22:{}}}

I wish

So which /leftypol/ server is the REAL /leftypol/ server?

<:hrt:312036949453963264> 💰 💀 👌

All right wingers are Facists right?

I wish.

depends if they have beaten Tonyhawk Underground 2

Ленин

@Zielgerät#0138 did you make it yourself?

@Argonbalt#8016 there is no real. We are worldwide in every country on every language.

>Dzerzhinsky is admin

oh boy

Somebody has to do the dirty job.

Hello ppl

Heloo

@Georg Lucucks

Hello @Firefly

Nice picture

Is that galaxies?