Anyone who buys or sells has people working for them

We are a complicated planet wide telephathic hyper being

if I sell my shoe to someone face to face I don't have anyone working for me

The taxonomy is far too complex to say anyone is a non-capitalist

Did you make shoe?

Did you make materials to make shoe?

Being capitalist or not doesn't depend on the belief of economic value

It precisely does.

I didn't make the shoe, I bought it before

It is an indication of belief in a value system and identity as such

So you didn't do shit

You took something someone else did, transferred value, then transferred that object for value

In that case I didn't have workers working for me

I just bought a shoe with my money

You have the manufacturer of that shoe working for you

and then sold it

no

I'm putting a case in which I'm no capitalist

I just buy from a shop and sell the shoe

with no people working for me

I'm just trading

now, if I had an enterprise and I had workers doing the shoes; I'd profit and pay the workers a wage

in that case I'd be a capitalist

Financial capital does not depends on production anymore.

It's too late there you're already a willing node in the capitalist system.

A tool of it.

GG NO RE

Production depends on financial capital.

no

Marx explains capitalism

INCORRECTLY

I'm telling who's a capitalist

in many cases.

you think that it depends on belief

I know this because marxists rarely understand economics.

neoclassical economics?

austrian ones?

The tools to understand it aren't in the Marxist literary pantheon.

they falsify marxism

that's why you hate it

@OF-8 Financial capital are Banks, Trade, Investment, international trade, war.