Message from @Blebleh
Discord ID: 314540193346486282
Anyone who buys or sells has people working for them
We are a complicated planet wide telephathic hyper being
if I sell my shoe to someone face to face I don't have anyone working for me
The taxonomy is far too complex to say anyone is a non-capitalist
Did you make shoe?
Did you make materials to make shoe?
Being capitalist or not doesn't depend on the belief of economic value
It precisely does.
I didn't make the shoe, I bought it before
It is an indication of belief in a value system and identity as such
So you didn't do shit
You took something someone else did, transferred value, then transferred that object for value
In that case I didn't have workers working for me
I just bought a shoe with my money
You have the manufacturer of that shoe working for you
and then sold it
no
I'm putting a case in which I'm no capitalist
I just buy from a shop and sell the shoe
with no people working for me
now, if I had an enterprise and I had workers doing the shoes; I'd profit and pay the workers a wage
in that case I'd be a capitalist
Financial capital does not depends on production anymore.
It's too late there you're already a willing node in the capitalist system.
A tool of it.
GG NO RE
Production depends on financial capital.
no
Marx explains capitalism
INCORRECTLY
I'm telling who's a capitalist
in many cases.
you think that it depends on belief
I know this because marxists rarely understand economics.
neoclassical economics?
austrian ones?
The tools to understand it aren't in the Marxist literary pantheon.
they falsify marxism
that's why you hate it