the capitalist is well defined

but you didn't read

"Nazi financier Hendrik Jozef Kouwenhoven, Roland Harriman's fellow-director at Union Banking Corporation in New York, was managing director of the Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V. (BHS) of Rotterdam. In 1940 the BHS held approximately $2.2 million assets in the Union Banking Corporation, which in turn did most of its business with BHS.20 In the 1930s Kouwenhoven was also a director of the Vereinigte Stahlwerke A.G., the steel cartel founded with Wall Street funds in the mid-1920s. Like Baron Schroder, he was a prominent Hitler supporter."

the owners of the means of productions are the bourgeoisie

bankers included

Do you think that the bank of the USSR was private?

it's not a "conspiracy" it's geneaology straight dope...and to be fair..it was you that mentioned the spectre of 33rd degree masonry anfter bleating out the catchword "anti semitism" lolol

@slack#7189 looks like Hitler was financed by US bankers, really makes me think

antisemitism for bakunin

😂

@slack

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/712284090d61.jpg

no, the nsdap got no funding after 33 and i already looked a lot into that.

bloodlines don't determine class

muh above top secret

we're in a class society not a society of castes

ah do you think it's fake?

are you trying to tell me these bankers didn't know in what they were investing?

😂

well, i say...fuck jewish supremacism in the eye...so i guess that would mean to you i hate all jews

Not necessarily

Jews are one thing, zionism is other

there was no investment after 1933...the nsdap went off plantation....hence samuel untermeyers speech

But seriously slack, don't embarass yourself more

zionists and static jewish power were in conflict in the 30s

no, communists aren't for jewish supremacism

Everything you've said so fair has been easily debunked in less than one second

i'm not embarrassing myself, i am highlighting the usual arguments as being fallacious

easily debunked in less than one second....sounds legit

They're not fallacious as there's proof of every one of them

lenin lets it clear that the party doesn't have to be influenced by religion

and Albania was the first socialist atheist state

theres proof for a lot of things in a controlled and rewritten academic appraisal

Not only that, state atheism was spread like crazy

you can search all their texts

whereas...if you go back tot he source documents...then it's a little bit different

Yeah, now it's all a historical revisionism, sure

could never happen

^fallacy

triggered ^

haha then you have to invent a global conspiracy that rewrites all the texts and hides it; even with the opposition of the communists, like a hidden and almighty elite that never gets wrong