Now this isn't even funny, it's just pathetic

like you arent omg

Look slack, this might work with your parents and people who don't know shit about economy or politics, but you can't join a political server in discord and try to pull the same shit on us

i stated unequivocally that capitalism is n extension of jewish usury.

Because then you get debunked in 5 minutes and have to constantly post this pathetic passive-aggresive messages to protect your ideology and your ego

"Capitalism is Usury. Its defining belief is ‘return on investment’. This is an extension of the ‘time value’ of money, which is the central tenet of modern economics. Capitalism is unthinkable without banking and banking is institutionalized Usury. "

usually people who talk about parents still live with theirs, i find...whereas i live with my children

this isn't capitalism

Then god help your children, because you have the mindset of a 5 year old

capitalism is thinkable without banking?

capitalism means that workers are submitted to private owners, they have to sell their labour force

and they receive a wage

they're not in the same level of power

to negotiate a "free contract"

you have the mindset of a particular ankle biting archytype...your jimmies are rusteld...you dont understand what happened in the 1930s vis a vi germany...not my issue

And the political knowledge of someone that uses wordpress as a reliable source

Btw, blebleh is telling you what capitalism is, you should pay attention

if you remove usury you still have what I said

there are still classes

thats an analysis stemming from leftist discourse...it isnt one based in historical emergence and fundamental precepts necessary for capital to function as an international entitiy...whereas the precept sof jewish usury do...as that is from where it stems

It might help you in future discussions and hell, maybe even you'll learn a thing or two about economy

it is based in historical emergence

classes existed within feudalism too...class isnt capitalist in origin

If you want to talk about historical emergence, then you should look at historical materialism, the relationships of power between oppressor and oppressed, etc.

got no interest in talking to you, triggered snowflake with russian name but not russian.. too triggeredm too easily

😂

Now you're pulling the "nah, I'm not going to talk to you" card

holy fuck, this is surreal

in socialism there aren't classes

there are only workers not the bourgeoisie

don't confuse caste with class

histoical materialism or dialectical materialism or whatever you what to frame it is...was and is fundamentally flawed as it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need

Now in english, please

caste and class? no, i wasnt....this is a semantic obsfuscation

Seriously, what the fuck do you mean

it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need

??

if you mean the dravidians in india, for example...wellm then that is different as it is genetic in expression....and to a certain extent at this poiht so is class...but without a solid analysis of race realism...it's all just flufff

ooh so you reject historical materialism because of pseudoscientifc racism

yes...dialectical materialism is fundamentally flawed as it prohibits the urgency of the phenomenological as a need among the proletariat

this is old