If you want to talk about historical emergence, then you should look at historical materialism, the relationships of power between oppressor and oppressed, etc.

got no interest in talking to you, triggered snowflake with russian name but not russian.. too triggeredm too easily

😂

Now you're pulling the "nah, I'm not going to talk to you" card

holy fuck, this is surreal

in socialism there aren't classes

there are only workers not the bourgeoisie

don't confuse caste with class

histoical materialism or dialectical materialism or whatever you what to frame it is...was and is fundamentally flawed as it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need

Now in english, please

caste and class? no, i wasnt....this is a semantic obsfuscation

Seriously, what the fuck do you mean

it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need

??

if you mean the dravidians in india, for example...wellm then that is different as it is genetic in expression....and to a certain extent at this poiht so is class...but without a solid analysis of race realism...it's all just flufff

ooh so you reject historical materialism because of pseudoscientifc racism

yes...dialectical materialism is fundamentally flawed as it prohibits the urgency of the phenomenological as a need among the proletariat

this is old

you think that people should have people above them because genetics?

i suggest reading "why race matters" by levin...a jewish guy... they you can have an opinion on if racial determination is "pseudoscientific" lmao...

race realism has been debunked millions of times, both theoretically and practically

no, i didnt sy that...racial realism is not racism...

nom,m it hasnt you shabbos

IQ tests that depend on education?

you cant debunk solid science with emoperical proof...you can only decry it as being unfair and then scream "debunked!" idiot

IQ tests aren't even made to measure intelligence

They're made to measure progress in education

factoid

initially yes...but not now...

It's not a factoid, it's why it was invented in the first palce

No, not initially

it still has the same function

for instance the average progress in education in syria is 82, whereas in germany it is 999

99

ah ok...you dont sound brainwashed

Yes, that's why people who live in more poor countries usually score lower

one big happy family free of capitalist oppression. jfc

Lower IQ has always been tied to poverty, not race

bullshit

It's only racists who link it to, for example, black people in america, because it's useful for their agenda

it's a tool for the reactionaries to call them dumb and justify their privilege