No, that's not racist to say

Those are physical abilities

but when it comes to intelligence, it isn't the same

and you are apparently the arbniter of political correctness in the 21st century..if someone wants to know what is ok or not ok to say...just ask you

You can see that results from people from the same economic background that are of different races overlap

intelligence averages are already extensively investigated

political correctness no, you base it to justify a state that is in the lives of the people and justifies one above another

calling itself socialist when it's not

in terms of ethnicity...its actually very very obvious...when your mind isnt obscrued by not wanting to say want isnt currently withion the accepted status quo of acceptable thought

I love how the argument is that historical materialism is shit because black people are dumb

It sure is an impressive "argument" to defend

how is historical materialism false? the modes of production have been changed

and yet its apparently my conceptions that are tantamount to those of a 5 yeard old child...you really QED'd that one

i already stated why..the necessary prohibtion of the phenomological is flawed

Yes, don't tell me it's more complex than that because you're basically saying that historical materialism is false because some races are more intelligent than others

it can never work

it already happened

Or because races have different characteristics overall

no, i was simply stating that some "races" vary in intellectual capactiy, uyes...with obviously bright people coming from all of them...i didnt actually say material dialecticism is flawed due to that, at all

"yes...dialectical materialism is fundamentally flawed as it prohibits the urgency of the phenomenological as a need among the proletariat"

material dialecticism, holy fuck

"holy" fucvk...now you are starting to get a handle on irony...well done

"histoical materialism or dialectical materialism or whatever you what to frame it is...was and is fundamentally flawed as it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need"

yes, materialism doesnt meet the innate needs of the species

what are those innate needs?

in the USSR healthcare, the life expectancy skyrocketed, improvements for women, more GDP than other countries

it worked without racism

better than the other systems

a need that the belief in "god" or whatever is not precluded

also, impressive technological developments

fast development

well...the Poles that escaped the gulag system to iran might disagree with that

bourgeois?

or revisionist?

or the czechs maybe

The error was prosecuting gays

because they believed the antigay pseudoscience in that time

Oh, so now you take out the "gulag" card to disprove the economic miracle of the USSR when we haven't mentioned the holocaust once when discussing about nazi germany

lezlek kolakowski...main currents in marxism..party member for decades...read that guy

gulags are labour camps

they're inherited from the tsarist katorga