Message from @Anglican
Discord ID: 321821017733595136
It actually is. Our senses could be tricking us, the entirity of the world and our feelings could all be constructed by something or someone else.
Yeah we aren't capable of grasping information outside of a subjective experience, if you want to get right down to it
@Deleted User psychoanalysis is fine to study. I see no harm. But there is so much literature on Marxism you can easily read whole life and not be there.
@Konduct Romans 2.7 subjective experience way be in intellectual field beyond your personal senses. Diamat makes it more objective.
>Yeah we aren't capable of grasping information outside of a subjective experience
Marxism makes you capable.
There are many so called Western Marxists like Lukacs who were against Soviet Marxism.
>Marxism
Any they revisionists?
>Lets
>yo
*you
>be
>objective
*Claps*
I learned about Marxism and I was delusional while a communist.
Objectivity does not just come from an ideology. It comes from trusting your senses and what you can directly observe, and what those you can trust and what they've observed. It's deeper that.
*than that.
A thousand times, and we can never be objective on what is objective and what isn't.
Science can show what is closer to objectivity though.
Of what is observable by humanity. That is.
That's what's interesting, we could all just be in the same big dream.
Humanity is not static.
This could all be generated by our collective conciousness.
I know that.
What is knowable keeps developing.
Of course.
So we advance towards the objective and material.
*But, is the material all that matters?*
Thats a serious question. Is this matter which makes us up on this place in our existance all that matters?
Or are we something more then this?
Something much more
No.
No to which statement?
All.
@Deleted User Many of them. Some of them were never connected to Marxism-Leninism. They were revolutionaries or thinkers of a time, but not essentially Marxist. Marxism has many planes. Some Marxist don't even go outside of philosophical field or their specialty. Most western Marxists are highly specialized and never have any common ground with other Marxist. This ideology is relatively new and more advance. It requires more effort too. So a lot of questions are not solved. And ideology is not completely formed too. You can't make same propaganda to workers 1917 in Russia and to petite bourgeoisie in Australia 2017
What?
>The material is not that all matters
>We are just material