Message from @Anglican

Discord ID: 321823805829808128


2017-06-07 01:29:17 UTC  

@Konduct Romans 2.7 it is true. Not objective.

2017-06-07 01:29:19 UTC  

But that decree of the God-Emperor is irrelevant to reality

2017-06-07 01:29:21 UTC  

There is no object.

2017-06-07 01:29:23 UTC  

*Fine, you're right*

2017-06-07 01:29:28 UTC  

>(

2017-06-07 01:29:47 UTC  

kek, active moderation bots

2017-06-07 01:29:49 UTC  

there doesn't need to be an object for a construct to be objective

2017-06-07 01:29:58 UTC  

>Social construct

2017-06-07 01:30:06 UTC  

...No

2017-06-07 01:30:07 UTC  

Guys, ideology is just a social contruct.

2017-06-07 01:30:18 UTC  

Mathematics is ideology now?

2017-06-07 01:30:23 UTC  

Yes

2017-06-07 01:30:26 UTC  

Totally what I meant.

2017-06-07 01:30:33 UTC  
2017-06-07 01:30:49 UTC  

But seriouslly, is it censoring the word 'nigga'?

2017-06-07 01:30:50 UTC  

...How is Math an ideology?

2017-06-07 01:30:53 UTC  

I guess not

2017-06-07 01:32:10 UTC  

The study of mathematics does not leave room for conjecture

2017-06-07 01:32:28 UTC  

Methods may vary, but the answers remain the same.

2017-06-07 01:32:38 UTC  

Actually not.

2017-06-07 01:32:54 UTC  

In the past, before we had centralised rules for the sequence of equations

2017-06-07 01:33:12 UTC  

sometimes, people from different nations WOULD come back with different anwsers from the same equation.

2017-06-07 01:33:51 UTC  

2+2=4

2017-06-07 01:33:53 UTC  

The international standard is now PMDAS I think

2017-06-07 01:34:00 UTC  

That's not all an equation is

2017-06-07 01:34:07 UTC  

every culture and nation in history would get that answer

2017-06-07 01:34:17 UTC  

if they don't, they are doctoring it's simplicity

2017-06-07 01:34:20 UTC  

for example, we're talking about things like: 5(3x+4)

2017-06-07 01:35:12 UTC  

ok i'm with you so far

2017-06-07 01:35:16 UTC  

@Konduct Romans 2.7 It is a restricted field of study. Somebody who studies this kind of specialized material might do it without integrating it with the laws of matter. Because of it very specialized form you do not perceive an objective reflection of the material object. Through the lens of mathematics alone objective cannot be seen.

2017-06-07 01:35:49 UTC  

And its not like they got it wrong, its that they have a SUBJECTIVE system for defining the PMDAS system.

2017-06-07 01:35:56 UTC  

So it is not objective. It is just abstract.

2017-06-07 01:35:59 UTC  

Highly

2017-06-07 01:36:01 UTC  

Say, MDPAS or something else.

2017-06-07 01:36:48 UTC  

There are orders of operation that are more logical, would you agree?

2017-06-07 01:37:04 UTC  

I'd love to say that there was some objectivity in this word: that my God was undeniably real, that I was undeinably a woman, that I was 100% white undeniably. But everything, is subjective in some way.

2017-06-07 01:37:21 UTC  

Is gravity subjective

2017-06-07 01:37:37 UTC  

Its a fact within itself, but how it works is subjective.

2017-06-07 01:37:43 UTC  

The theory there in, not the fact.

2017-06-07 01:37:51 UTC  

reminder that once objectivity is gone the only thing that makes something right is power

2017-06-07 01:37:57 UTC  

Something true is not necessarily objective.