w/o him there would be no difference

Maybe not, but hten he will find somewhere else. Capitalism creates artificial unemployment. I have no doubt the """""job""""" market will be infinitely different post-revolution

why not? i mean you never even gave the chance t o be in a posistion where there is a reason to work hard, you pay min wage you get min effort what do you expect

again, not my problem

that's more like a peasant

I worry for myself and my family

and in this case I am feeling nice

but you are saying he doesnt deserve it cause he is lazy

but he does not deserve anything more

I already give him a job and wage

even though he does nothing

but there is no reason for him to exert more than min effort

you are creating a catch 22

In socialism he would have a job, good working hours and a full wage

I gave him a raise before

no change in work ethic

He is just a leech

but he'd be paid less if he worked less

I have to deal with him because I do not want him selling drugs on the block

then you're doing charity

I don't think you would have to worry about that post-revolution

does this guy deserve more than I already gave him

he does not even deserve this

but no boss and no employee would ever accept a decrease in pay as a option this whole scenerio is completely bananas

I decreased pay because the increase did not do anything

right now I could do anything with pay

because he is useless

I do not need him

but this happens in no reality

how do you know? Everything I have said is very possible

I could just feel bad for this man

but not bad enough to give him part of my business

the nature of business is exploitation

maybe he's a labour aristocrat

this man is my only worker

no its really not possible cultural etiquite and reality of capitalist society this scenerio never happens

everyone else is family

receiving part of the wages of other workers

I am talking in this scenario

what would happen?

but the scenerio is bananas