i just wanted a cookie..

you arent saying anything that grants more complex answers

i gave you a very open ended question, you failed on every account

anyway, this is getting meta

again, seems like more avoidance from my point of view

i answered and you said it wasnt good enough and i didnt answer originally cause i knew you were gonna say it wasnt good enough

like im damned if i do or dont

i never said it wasnt good enough, i acknowleged that i knew i wasnt gonna get anything better

not really, you could have been very specific in how you deviate from the typology, instead you just speak in vague generalities

you talk about what you did, not why you did

hmm you said i was trying to hide that i fit into one of those or that deep down i knew i did you implied i was being secretive

i just feel like a woman, because i feel like a woman

no, i just know how people act

so ya basically it wasnt good enough and it wouldnt be good enough unless you say the 20 page psyche eval, but you would probably say it was tainted by the psychologist liberal biases or some shit at that point

look, we've all been caught with our pants down.. its ok.. the best thing to do is admit it and not dig yourself into a deeper hole, to mix my metaphores

you cant just say im caught with my pants down and its so

not really, if you want to put a liberal bias is up to you

like this is strawmaning i think right

what you are doing

rather than actually proving a point you are strawmanning if im not confused

no, its like being caught with you pants down, and giving vague answers like "one thing led to another"

vague and general

ya strawmaning

not specific

im not strawmanning, its an analogy

ok well keep straw manning ill leave you to that

if i was strawmanning, you would actually have had to provide an argument to straw man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mAeJYk36Kg&index=2&list=RDMMDNZ30WxvQkk

im not gonna give you a life story sorry

if i want to take the least cheritable view of my position, the most you can say is that i am coloring the situation

there, im even making your argument for you

Syntax seems, otherwise, rather rational and calm.

look, you keep going back to that

I'm assuming you're a Christian Conseravtive? Cause that is the only group who can act in this way.

i never asked you for your life story, i asked you for how you deviate from the typology. this is basically the fifth time ive had to type that out. but i know you wont

either way, i know this wont go anywhere, so whatever

i have given up syntax sorry

just dont feel like this

its fine

just dont assume my ignorance off the bat, like you did

I never did