Message from @(A = B) ≃ (A ≃ B)

Discord ID: 323369075441139713


2017-06-11 07:50:04 UTC  

i never called you a liar

2017-06-11 07:50:18 UTC  

like you said i was a liar and trying to hide things

2017-06-11 07:50:25 UTC  

and that i was called out and embarrassed

2017-06-11 07:50:25 UTC  

i didnt

2017-06-11 07:50:29 UTC  

you did

2017-06-11 07:50:31 UTC  

He feels as if he can't trust you.

2017-06-11 07:50:37 UTC  

That was what he said.

2017-06-11 07:50:37 UTC  

well, you do seem to be embarressed, yes

2017-06-11 07:50:44 UTC  

hmm how so

2017-06-11 07:51:10 UTC  

because you are giving very vague and simplistic answers, just like someone who has been caught with their hand in a cookie jar

2017-06-11 07:51:22 UTC  

uh?

2017-06-11 07:51:26 UTC  

whut

2017-06-11 07:51:31 UTC  

i just wanted a cookie..

2017-06-11 07:51:39 UTC  

you arent saying anything that grants more complex answers

2017-06-11 07:51:54 UTC  

i gave you a very open ended question, you failed on every account

2017-06-11 07:52:08 UTC  

anyway, this is getting meta

2017-06-11 07:52:21 UTC  

again, seems like more avoidance from my point of view

2017-06-11 07:52:23 UTC  

i answered and you said it wasnt good enough and i didnt answer originally cause i knew you were gonna say it wasnt good enough

2017-06-11 07:52:42 UTC  

like im damned if i do or dont

2017-06-11 07:52:42 UTC  

i never said it wasnt good enough, i acknowleged that i knew i wasnt gonna get anything better

2017-06-11 07:53:15 UTC  

not really, you could have been very specific in how you deviate from the typology, instead you just speak in vague generalities

2017-06-11 07:53:23 UTC  

you talk about what you did, not why you did

2017-06-11 07:53:26 UTC  

hmm you said i was trying to hide that i fit into one of those or that deep down i knew i did you implied i was being secretive

2017-06-11 07:53:37 UTC  

i just feel like a woman, because i feel like a woman

2017-06-11 07:53:49 UTC  

no, i just know how people act

2017-06-11 07:54:20 UTC  

so ya basically it wasnt good enough and it wouldnt be good enough unless you say the 20 page psyche eval, but you would probably say it was tainted by the psychologist liberal biases or some shit at that point

2017-06-11 07:54:24 UTC  

look, we've all been caught with our pants down.. its ok.. the best thing to do is admit it and not dig yourself into a deeper hole, to mix my metaphores

2017-06-11 07:54:51 UTC  

you cant just say im caught with my pants down and its so

2017-06-11 07:54:55 UTC  

not really, if you want to put a liberal bias is up to you

2017-06-11 07:54:59 UTC  

like this is strawmaning i think right

2017-06-11 07:55:02 UTC  

what you are doing

2017-06-11 07:55:24 UTC  

rather than actually proving a point you are strawmanning if im not confused

2017-06-11 07:55:24 UTC  

no, its like being caught with you pants down, and giving vague answers like "one thing led to another"

2017-06-11 07:55:32 UTC  

vague and general

2017-06-11 07:55:32 UTC  

ya strawmaning

2017-06-11 07:55:34 UTC  

not specific

2017-06-11 07:55:42 UTC  

im not strawmanning, its an analogy

2017-06-11 07:56:03 UTC  

ok well keep straw manning ill leave you to that

2017-06-11 07:56:10 UTC  

if i was strawmanning, you would actually have had to provide an argument to straw man.

2017-06-11 07:56:14 UTC  

im not gonna give you a life story sorry