Message from @(A = B) ≃ (A ≃ B)
Discord ID: 323370858531782656
if i want to take the least cheritable view of my position, the most you can say is that i am coloring the situation
there, im even making your argument for you
Syntax seems, otherwise, rather rational and calm.
look, you keep going back to that
I'm assuming you're a Christian Conseravtive? Cause that is the only group who can act in this way.
i never asked you for your life story, i asked you for how you deviate from the typology. this is basically the fifth time ive had to type that out. but i know you wont
either way, i know this wont go anywhere, so whatever
i have given up syntax sorry
just dont feel like this
its fine
just dont assume my ignorance off the bat, like you did
I never did
you are mistaken
....
im not gonna scroll up and quote you
i said i trust doctors more
*At least Syntax believes what he says*
Unlike some.
do you trust this guy?
Nope.
He needs some good gasin'.
oh strawmanning again lele like i dunno you just arent worth arguing with friendo
but still, just because they are a doctor doesnt mean they are trustworthy
omg
its not strawmanning, its cherry picking... get your fallacies straight
with a side of appeal to emotion noice
its not an appeal to emotion
im not appealing to your emotional response as the basis of my argument
seriously get your fallacies straight
Well, cherry picking is plenty ineffective.
And the fact that man tourtured children... It is sort of an emotional appeal.
im not saying, yes, your anger at this doctor is what makes him wrong. im saying he is wrong because of what he did
not really, im not appealing to the emotion of the people in the room, if i was then it would be an appeal to emotion
Fine, fine.
I'm gonna go and draw a cross flag or something.
schweet
Wait, I already have one.
i like it