rather than actually proving a point you are strawmanning if im not confused

no, its like being caught with you pants down, and giving vague answers like "one thing led to another"

vague and general

ya strawmaning

not specific

im not strawmanning, its an analogy

ok well keep straw manning ill leave you to that

if i was strawmanning, you would actually have had to provide an argument to straw man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mAeJYk36Kg&index=2&list=RDMMDNZ30WxvQkk

im not gonna give you a life story sorry

if i want to take the least cheritable view of my position, the most you can say is that i am coloring the situation

there, im even making your argument for you

Syntax seems, otherwise, rather rational and calm.

look, you keep going back to that

I'm assuming you're a Christian Conseravtive? Cause that is the only group who can act in this way.

i never asked you for your life story, i asked you for how you deviate from the typology. this is basically the fifth time ive had to type that out. but i know you wont

either way, i know this wont go anywhere, so whatever

i have given up syntax sorry

just dont feel like this

its fine

just dont assume my ignorance off the bat, like you did

I never did

you are mistaken

....

im not gonna scroll up and quote you

i said i trust doctors more

*At least Syntax believes what he says*

Unlike some.

http://crimefeed.com/2015/05/florida-pediatric-dentist-accused-seriously-harming-children-years/

do you trust this guy?

i know im cherry picking a bit

Nope.

He needs some good gasin'.

oh strawmanning again lele like i dunno you just arent worth arguing with friendo

but still, just because they are a doctor doesnt mean they are trustworthy

omg

its not strawmanning, its cherry picking... get your fallacies straight

with a side of appeal to emotion noice

its not an appeal to emotion

im not appealing to your emotional response as the basis of my argument

seriously get your fallacies straight