Message from @Cotton
Discord ID: 324692855341711360
Le communism xD
Dae communist???
@Deleted User people get revelations in many religions, it's kind of obvious revelations are bullshit
Transgender people are the worst
How do we get rid of this shitty trend
It's pronounced SHO-PAN, dreg.
"I believe in it because I believe in it"
That's the retard logic
@Deleted User
Stfu tranny
>chopin
>not wagner
what did go wrong
How do we stop the trannies
Wagner is a faggot
Guis
How do we stop them
It's not logical. Basing your belief on logic is a mistake, because such rationalisations will always full short of the reality.
I'm bored
No spam please.
Revelation is a response to the inadequacy of reason.
"highest object of worship, monotheism"
*Palamas drew a distinction between knowing God in his essence (Greek ousia) and knowing God in his energies (Greek energeiai).*
Is knowing God's energies idolatry?
I'm assuming you're coming from the general concept of monotheism
As in an abrahamic religion
Yes, Palamas is Orthodox Christian.
I see, is there a source for the explanation of that energy concept tho, I am curious?
It is based on Palamism and the practice of Hesychasm, a form of prayer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palamism
Will check it out, thanks
Also, the conceptualisation in comparative religion that there is either a single correct religion or they are all incorrect, is a notion based on Aristotlean logic. And, as we should learn, such deductions are prone to error.
Hey! Is anyone online?
This practice apparently constitutes Christian mysticism.
*"Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, the sinner."*
although religions can't be mutually correct, as it would contradict the whole philosophy behind a *religion*
there is a reason they were born as different religions with different ideas and dogmas
You're using abstract logic to try to determine the ultimate nature of reality. I don't know how useful that is.
'Philosophy' by the way, is an artefact of Greek reasoning. This is only upheld in the west and by Catholicism, contrary to Orthodox who have always been against such rash deductions.
If philosophy worked so well, why was Aristotle wrong about so many things?
No I get that, what I'm saying is that a religion simply can't exist without denying other religions in existence
As in, you can't form a new set of thoughts without denying the former ones