If he was useful why did they kill him?

Gaddafi was a crazy scumbag and that's pretty much all there was to him during my lifetime.

They'd keep him in power like every other crackpot dictator such as Pinochet

Because his usefulness expired.

Than he wasn't useful

That's not a very good argument.

You're both imperialists

Eh?

Can you not tell the difference between useful now and not useful tomorrow?

That's not the point

Imperialists have their own games.

You know who made a new place after Gadaffi? Islamic militants. They have the new use to imperialist policy.

@Deleted User What's your point? that doesn't make Gaddafi an Imperialist puppet

No, no, his craziness and ease of provocation did that.

Imperialist

Don't project stuff.

I'm not, I'm calling out liberals for what they are

You are projecting.

>There will never be another dictator who suggests we split Switzerland

>muh projectuion

You don't know me at all, man. I've said like, six things to you.

I can still tell you're an imperialist

THAT IS PROJECTING

>I'm a psychiatrist xD

Man, you're as bad as righties on Twitter.

Okay

Sorry I don't support the liberal west

Yeah, neiter do I, fuck face.

You clearly do

Sorry, just had to add some inflection there.

Fair enough

I'm sorry

No, it's okay.

I will end it here. I am saying that Gaddafi was allowed to exist, because the moment he wasn't useful he died. When you review the recent history of Libya it is clear that is did not have strong effect to turn others to Communism. To imperialist powers, Gaddafi was a lesser evil, because he was a basic dictator, with no effect on others, and only interested in his own land. On every level he was a very poor theoretician, because he did nothing to help the international working class. Yes, expectation is high, but because it has to be. History is a tough judge.

Isn't it less Orwellian to just say he was stupid and really easy to troll?

Yes but Dusseldorf would never understand that.

Do you support Gaddafi, Dusseldorf?

*did

@Deleted User But you're essentially calling him an imperialist based on the fact that he wasn't "assassinated sooner"