A good example, not only has a long history of anti-imperialism, but also survives because they understand the practical application of theory.

Like Stalin.

What I'm describing is literally anti-imperialism

Where? Gaddafi only cares about Gaddafi.

Or 'Libya'.

He heavily increased literacy, housing and the overall living standards in Libya. He also had democracy on a local level.

I agree.

People literally lived longer in Libya than they did in the states

you can't say he didn't care about his people

I didn't. I said he didn't fight imperialism.

This is global.

He did when he tried to remove Libya from the petro dollar and get all of Africa on a gold backed currency. He was essentially trying to liberate the entire african continent from American imperialism

How many revolutions outside of Libya did Gaddafi support?

With success.

He failed because of trying to establish a currency system. Everybody knows the modern currencies have to be the end of all currency. Nothing can replace them and they must be dismantled systematically and permanently. Any currency that takes its place will eventually become imperialistic in its nature.

The Denar was a revolution all of it's own. I can't name them all off the top of my head but I can say with absolute certainty that he supported the IRA along with other revolutions. You're essentially saying "lol if a revolution doesn't win, it's not socialist"

tfw you miss the enigmatic Gaddafi, if just because he represents an older terror in the news than ISIS

It's not socialist because of his capitalist intentions.

No I am saying that practice is important. You have to walk the walk. Theory must meet practice otherwise it is unscientific. Gaddafi was all talk and thus useful to the imperialists.

If he was useful why did they kill him?

Gaddafi was a crazy scumbag and that's pretty much all there was to him during my lifetime.

They'd keep him in power like every other crackpot dictator such as Pinochet

Because his usefulness expired.

Than he wasn't useful

That's not a very good argument.

You're both imperialists

Eh?

Can you not tell the difference between useful now and not useful tomorrow?

That's not the point

Imperialists have their own games.

You know who made a new place after Gadaffi? Islamic militants. They have the new use to imperialist policy.

@Deleted User What's your point? that doesn't make Gaddafi an Imperialist puppet

No, no, his craziness and ease of provocation did that.

Imperialist

Don't project stuff.

I'm not, I'm calling out liberals for what they are

You are projecting.

>There will never be another dictator who suggests we split Switzerland

>muh projectuion

You don't know me at all, man. I've said like, six things to you.

I can still tell you're an imperialist