Imperialists have their own games.

You know who made a new place after Gadaffi? Islamic militants. They have the new use to imperialist policy.

@Deleted User What's your point? that doesn't make Gaddafi an Imperialist puppet

No, no, his craziness and ease of provocation did that.

Imperialist

Don't project stuff.

I'm not, I'm calling out liberals for what they are

You are projecting.

>There will never be another dictator who suggests we split Switzerland

>muh projectuion

You don't know me at all, man. I've said like, six things to you.

I can still tell you're an imperialist

THAT IS PROJECTING

>I'm a psychiatrist xD

Man, you're as bad as righties on Twitter.

Okay

Sorry I don't support the liberal west

Yeah, neiter do I, fuck face.

You clearly do

Sorry, just had to add some inflection there.

Fair enough

I'm sorry

No, it's okay.

I will end it here. I am saying that Gaddafi was allowed to exist, because the moment he wasn't useful he died. When you review the recent history of Libya it is clear that is did not have strong effect to turn others to Communism. To imperialist powers, Gaddafi was a lesser evil, because he was a basic dictator, with no effect on others, and only interested in his own land. On every level he was a very poor theoretician, because he did nothing to help the international working class. Yes, expectation is high, but because it has to be. History is a tough judge.

Isn't it less Orwellian to just say he was stupid and really easy to troll?

Yes but Dusseldorf would never understand that.

Do you support Gaddafi, Dusseldorf?

*did

@Deleted User But you're essentially calling him an imperialist based on the fact that he wasn't "assassinated sooner"

Did you say that, Chopin?

It's a silly argument to make @Deleted User

You also have to factor in the fact that the U.S. wasn't always able to Justify a war with Gaddafi

If he did not actually name Gaddafi as an imperialist, I would advise you to check your argument a little bit to make sure you aren't projecting again.

They were only able to do so in 2011 because we had reached a point to where the population had become complacent with regards to the idea of perpetual warfare

Remain on point in your dialectic.

I'm pretty sure Gaddafi was always "asking for it".

@Revolutionary Nationalist said that he was always fighting imperialism, my response that the moment he did (in not being useful) he was killed. I made the point that if he had been a good Communist, he would have his whole life to defend against Capitalist assassination. But in reality, he never had to defend against it, because he was not targeted. I am finished with this.

Was he ever not an insane war criminal?

Communism isn't the only enemy to Liberalism