Message from @Bernoulli
Discord ID: 344762137555632129
numbers don't matter in an age of WMDs
that'd be hypocrisy if you just accused us of being polluters
@Deleted User most will live after the war.
small numbers mean easier wipeout by WMDs, in any case
what, aren't you afraid of nuclear winter? fallout? destroying the earth?
>implying nukes are the only weapons of mass destruction
What to do after the war @Deleted User
yeah, how about you split open the earth's crust too, while you're at it.
>implying we wouldn't just explode a nuke under the ocean and create an enormous tsunami destroying most of china's coastal population
>implying we wouldn't use chemical warfare
your hatred for chyna is amusing
>chemical warfare that would irrevocably damage the world's ecosystems
>nuclear weapons that would irrevocably damage the world's ecosystems
you seem to be having an issue with this "pollution and eco-friendly solutions" thing
@Deleted User so you would not only go to war but also genocide?
>implying china has any ecosystems left
hemp groes everywhere here
Not necessarily genocide
I can get high by walking outside and picking some leafs
you haven't seen western china's ecosystem
>western china hosts most of the population
your point was about ecosystems
don't change the point
@Deleted User then they will live and will be unhappy with you.
of course it was
@Bernoulli you should consider tourism in our southern provinces. the hills are famous there.
but there are no ecosystems in the east
none of significance
that's where all the population is
It would be very easy to destroy China
oh?
if NATO decided tomorrow
and we went all out
sure
amusing dream
*you're more than welcome to try*
I would love to
but the politicians of nowadays have a lot more shifting to do
edgy
>USA threatens China with WMDS