Message from @Tenshimaru_Tokugawa

Discord ID: 355872975066759170


2017-09-08 21:46:41 UTC  

@Deleted User I've found pronouncation is actually /pʰjɔŋjaŋ/ and it's closer to our Phenian than English Pyongyang.

2017-09-08 22:07:27 UTC  

?

2017-09-08 22:07:35 UTC  

ŋ is ng

2017-09-08 22:07:44 UTC  

j is y

2017-09-08 22:08:01 UTC  

ɔ is pretty much always transliterated as o in english

2017-09-08 22:08:30 UTC  

i dont see how the one aspirated h which is hard to notice anyway, is a difference so great that it outshines the easy to notice one called ŋ versus n

2017-09-08 22:09:15 UTC  

actually pyongyang is from the official south korean transliterations

2017-09-08 22:09:51 UTC  

the only majour difference i can recall between north and south korean is a few differences in words and oe being pronounced oe in north we in south

2017-09-08 22:10:02 UTC  

if it werent obvious already, oe isnt in the name pyongyang

2017-09-08 22:10:47 UTC  

so the most majour difference isnt even involved with the name

2017-09-08 22:11:00 UTC  

so the south korean translits can be used just as well for the north korean ones

2017-09-08 22:12:58 UTC  

actually in most languages that have an ng sound its pyongyang or similar

2017-09-08 22:13:01 UTC  

but w/e

2017-09-08 22:13:23 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/355838055162314752/unknown.png

2017-09-08 22:53:22 UTC  

Why did the Communists betray the Anarchists in Catalonia? 😢

2017-09-08 23:05:54 UTC  

@here can a syndicalist teach me about syndicalism?

2017-09-08 23:06:05 UTC  

I'm trying to research it

2017-09-08 23:22:31 UTC  

I'd be interested in learning about it, too

2017-09-09 00:23:43 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/355870855172980737/image.png

2017-09-09 00:32:06 UTC  

I want the world to explode and my dick to grow

2017-09-09 00:32:09 UTC  

Goodbye

2017-09-09 00:32:11 UTC  

Y

2017-09-09 00:32:37 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/355873095493484544/CwHSJ6zWYAAMUiK.png

2017-09-09 00:44:38 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/355876118592618497/0l3267q3ejkz.png

2017-09-09 00:44:39 UTC  

OWorld is fuck

2017-09-09 00:45:29 UTC  

Jews stay with the world, everyone get off.

2017-09-09 03:20:58 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/355915459373039636/67ac38_5128267.png

2017-09-09 03:22:05 UTC  

What did he mean by this? What is "the essential" and why it is of highest importance?

2017-09-09 03:22:11 UTC  

@bread#0708

2017-09-09 03:24:36 UTC  

I think he was getting at a sort of completion of character and interaction with the world

2017-09-09 03:24:51 UTC  

The quote is about anti-materialism

2017-09-09 03:25:39 UTC  

He transcended materialism in an extremely complicated way, his books illustrate that

2017-09-09 03:26:03 UTC  

I would very much like to understand how his idea of character transcends materialism.

2017-09-09 03:27:14 UTC  

He describes it in Ride the tiger, men among the ruins, and revolt against the modern world

2017-09-09 03:27:33 UTC  

he spoke of the metaphysical hero

2017-09-09 03:32:59 UTC  

Why is it more important than material reality?

2017-09-09 03:35:17 UTC  

I don't think he approaches it from that perspective

2017-09-09 03:35:33 UTC  

but I personally think that it is more important

2017-09-09 03:35:49 UTC  

The physical nature of something tells you nothing of it's utility or it's importance

2017-09-09 03:36:13 UTC  

Materialism has no future or past @Deleted User

2017-09-09 03:37:31 UTC  

>The physical nature of something tells you nothing of it's utility or it's importance
I fully agree with this. But then how to make the leap into the metaphysical? Seems like just idealism.