Feudalism is global

shut up

Wanna know something quality?

The T-34

Wasn't even meant to be a quality tank

It's simplicity was its quality

You need specialists to fix a German tank

Not particular. But it was generalised enough to work in mass production and just throw it at your enemy.

Any peasant with a wrench could fix a T-34

@Deleted User >Collapsed catastrophically in 1991 and a miniature civil war took place following the events which lead to remnants of the union being purged completely from the government
Seems successful to me.

Couldn it be other issues?

And not the economic system within itself?

Oh boy is this the dank bunker enthusiast discord

@Deleted User You just said Socialism only works on small scale. USSR was socialist and not small scale. Don't change the subject.

@Epic Dadrocking Gamer Podcasters I'm a a Market Socialist and Fascist Dx

lmao

No Bunkerstands here

*stan

REEEEEE

@Anglican Socialism really can hardly compete with capitalism, only the soviet union mamaged to compete, and that was only after it reformed to become more democratic and pro free market.

But bruh the hurricanes coming only prove that Hoxhaist Posadism is the way

>Socialism can't compete

But it is MORE MORAL and more RATIONAL for the FOLK

@Deleted User Right, and it still preformed mass genocides and collapsed in the end.

Capitalism is a DEMON that has posioned us for too long, it needs to all be delt with.

Exercised from our national and global spirits

@Deleted User Collapsed in the end because they introduced markets into Socialism.

@Anglican Now hold on there trotsky, you cannot get everybody to magically embrace socialism.

I'm not Trotsky.

And it won't be magic.

Trots get the icepick.

We'll have to work toward creating a world wide opposition to such a disgusting economic system.

It clashes with all forms of nationalism that cares about maintaince of the nation too.

@Deleted User And couldn't that be seen as them failing to combat capitalism and instead embracing it?

@Deleted User What do you mean 'them'? Khrushchev was opportunistic and had bourgeois tendencies. USSR basically died with Stalin. Besides, this is not the end of Socialism. It keeps on coming back. Not so for Fascism.

@Deleted User Yet stalin was with the rebellion from the beginning, so are you saying it was dead from the start?

I have no idea what you are saying. Defeating 80% of the Wehrmacht is not a failure in management.

Yet sending tens of thousands into the urals and it ending with widespread cannibalism and starvation also isn't a failure?

War is difficult. Is this news to you? Also after the war the USSR was stronger than it had ever been.

Just because they had military strength does not mean they were successful.

It's a matter of smart resource allocation. If you can't survive a war, you're dead. Success is not dying.