Message from @olev
Discord ID: 386042361182027776
Not really. It was the method to get there which varied.
I don't care what Kim II Sung's idea of communism was
Even marxists and anarchists pretty much share the same definition of communism
By claiming that this is not the definition of communism, you are going against 99% of communists
Communism could be an economic term only too. A stateless society is only something we see in Karl Marx's version of Communism
False.
You know what
Let's assume that
Communism is an economic term
Define the communist economic system
I just don't think "Communism" is THAT simple...
I think Communism can be classless, moneyless, and still have a state
How?
What role would it have?
It's effectively Communism with people assigned to their roles
You can't be serious
Why would you force labor
in communism
Do you mean, why would an authority such as the state force people into jobs?
Yes
You can have a classless society, with people carefully assigned jobs that suit them best, based on their talents, characteristics, and even desires
Tests and surveys, for example.
So you shouldn't have the freedom to work in the field you want to?
Also you think that you can have a classless society without the necessary productive forces
That is unscientific
There could be a balance between the state and the individual with regards to job placement, some negotiation with Comrade-Councillor Olev
@olev How so? You can have a purely Agrarian society that is free of the state, class, and money
Primitive as hell, but still Communism
Or Cambodia, where there IS a state, and it has no money, and no class, and no happiness too!
Ok, look, I need to type a paper, and it's getting late
We'll continue this later Comrade
Don't call me comrade you retard
You're LARPing as a communist
💔
I cri
you idiots are ***still*** talking?
okay good you finally all shut up
@Llyod14 are you faggots still on
i legit wrote a 5 paper legal case in the time it took you to argue about muh communism