Message from @olev
Discord ID: 386039999323176961
Why do you still have no source
Kiernan, Ben (1997). The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power, and Genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge,
I'm going into full caps rage
Okay let me just order the book
I have no mouth, but I must scream
Yes, you go order this book and learn all about Cambodia
You obviously have not read it yourself
I have only read snippets
Only what I can find on book review sites
lol
Give me an actual source
That I can deal with
I believe this book will tell you everything about how Pol Pot made Cambodia utterly classless
That Cambodia was classless, from each according to his contribution, to each according to his ability
They failed, but I think they did achieve that, to some extent
Regardless, the widely accepted simple definition of communism is a classless, stateless, moneyless society
I disagree
"Widely accepted"
Your definition of communism is incorrect
pffft
Widely accepted by Liberal Intellectuals
Why do you even want to call yourself a communist
You're obviously not one
You make yourself look like a moron
You know what? Maybe I should just settle with "Socialist."
That's less autistic
But you probably still don't have the correct definition of socialism
You know, with all the lines you read shitposting on Discord today, you could have been half way through Das Kapital by now. Sadly you insist on perpetuating your own stupidity.
There are many different ideas of what Socialism and Communism are, history has shown us this
You also could have tied a noose and hung yourself by this time
are
not
subjective
You could have gassed yourself by now
You mean natsocs
Who were capitalist but somehow claimed to be socialist?
And I agree with that, definitions are objective, but Lenin had a very different idea of Communism compared to Kim Il Sung
Not really. It was the method to get there which varied.
I don't care what Kim II Sung's idea of communism was