The states were governed by those not of that supermajority with the support of regional strongmen that turned into dictators later :l

So yea it's entirely a bad thing because they never just find themselves maintained naturally because "why not" it's a matter of economic and racial dimensions, a deliberate choice. To the detriment of brown people globally :l

So you do not disagree with "not many came to Europe in the first place." and then you went on a tirade about imperialism and what it means to be a member of a nation?
Aight.
And now you're saying that ethnonationalism harms blacks globally because empires existed?
Aight. Sure. Whites being the majority in their own countries harms blacks in Africa somehow.

Unless you're saying that whites being the majority in their own countries lead to whites colonising everything or some dumb shit, in which case let me drag you into the 21st century by telling you that the age of empires is over.

It's been over for a pretty long while, at least a few decades

@Cam I said they didn't come initially because they for one couldn't,

Saying they just "didn't come" is misleading

And I explained why they come now

Which is the only reason you give a shit about the word in the first place

And I'm saying it harms brown people in general as that's the largest global example for the use of ethnonationalism

Its oddly enough never those who're considered European of origin who have the issue as a minority.

Again, not that it explicitly harms blacks in a country that for all accounts wasn't created by them, wasn't controlled by them, and wasnt used to enrich their lives until a few decades ago

But that what it does indirectly is harm blacks because you use it as an excuse to keep them from coming to wherever they seek to go, after raping their lands

You proclaim, "Oh our culture" after literally stunting the cultures or various people's globally through imperialism, causing the migration in the first place

But then again, I didn't think I'd need to explain all that again, in different words

The point remains the same. Its a cop out to resign people to suffering caused by the actions of your "dead empires" that still despite being dead, repatriate so much profit to their shores they can fund universal healthcare for entire continents they exploit

334 F17 The Global South-1.pdf

Might be a little interesting read for you

But you just might have to adopt a historically sound worldview recognizing systemic continuity of issues particularly within co-dependent economies. You know, develop the understanding that things dont just "begin" or "stop" being an issue on a dime, and that none of the countries we're talking about developed independently of one another.

>*The imperialists caused migration*

huehuehuehuehue

I just finished making dinner and now sitting down eating it. Don't try making me choke on my food through how hard you're making me laugh you bastard.
They come now because of the big, lucrative welfare states of Europe, they're coming to leech off richer countries. Simple as that.
Oh, what a surprise, European people have an issue with being a potentially being a minority in their own countries! Who would have ever fucking guessed?
Yeah, African countries were enriched by knowledge, technology all brought over to Africa by Europeans. But I guess that's called "raping their lands" right? Coming along, bringing knowledge and technology but taking a little of the native resources, then when they leave the tech and knowledge is left behind unscathed? Sure. Totally raping lands. The Europeans fucking traded with the Africans, guns in return for slaves to ship off to the Americas as one example.
Didn't say anything about culture as far as I can remember, but yeah Africans being the majority in Europe and North America will destroy the native culture and turn the countries they gain control of into more Africa. Simple logic.
Also there is no way to stunt the development of cultures by introducing them to more advanced technology, more complex ideas (such as natural rights and economics) and more complex languages.
Yeah, I'm not bothering to read that. I have better things to do than read left-wing drivel.
Your worldview is not sound it is left-wing.

LOL

TL;DR: Niggers consume whatever they're given, they also turn whatever they touch into more Africa and if they can get free shit, they'll go to where they can get it

So you didn't read

And are going to bullshit an entire revision of history based on

"Whites are gr8"

Gooooodd goooodd

Mate, I have an digital library of history books to read as it is.
Not gonna go onto whatever drivel you're handing me until I am done with what is on the list first.

"Drivel" because anything you have to read that says you're full of shit is drivel

But yea, tell me more about how they introduced civilization and technology, by moving wealth and resources to the global North

This is good

No, anything left-wing is drivel.
And you sound like a hardcore lefty to me, treating niggers like incompetent children.

If you get imaginative enough, you might be able to write your own history book!

Just think of it now man

Cause my political perspective doesn't change the reality on the ground

Hell yeah, now we're getting onto the condescending tone because "you didn't read this thing I told you to read"

All one really needs to know how to do

Is read

And, from how you're sounding, it sounds like everything you're reading is full as shit trying to treat the white man like a fucking devil!

My political leaning left or right doesn't determine the reality of the exploitation of the third world, doesn't determine the figures of human suffering,