but are yo a consumer or a producer

Yes, people with an *exclusive and dominant interest*.

Are you about to argue 'muh iPhones'?

you have this differnce , if every one would be a producer we would have zero need for a system or a state

but not every one is

and no one is all the time

And you believe that disputes that would arise from this (which you assume would exist in the first place) would need the force of a state to crush.

As for the resource drain, it tawould take a lot to make a biological being morph in to someting else

Here we go again.

even in some kind of bio chamber it would take time

time that will be taken away iof production time

But you don't know what technologies would exist.

it wouldnt be efficent

And you don't know about the scales of the resources that we might have.

it would be such a drain to make every one capable of being one thing one day and another thing the next that you will never be able to afford it

I'm sure that the feudalists would say the same of the gig economy.

the scale of teh resources, like you said is based partcially on the use of those resources is finite. And teh ability to handle these resources is finite as well

But they grow, do they not?

the resources were there during the feudal times they just dint know how to acces it

And I'm not saying that people have to change 'every day' right from the off.

and unless zero point energy becomes a thing you will always have energy consumtion

And the resources are there for us now in capitalism.

either way this is all idilic future talk not based in reality

Hell, we have *the asteroid belt* to mine.

Idyllic only because you think it's unachievable.

And if you say that this is the way to have marx his communism

we are not theer yet so we cant have it

because we have not developed tech and the biological being to the point were that idilic view is posible

We could have Communism today, actually, if there was a political force that could establish it.

The last one was the USSR, which is kaput.

You cannot abolish class as class is a natural phenonomemn

And nature is subject to be changed by us.

the ego

The reality of responsibility.

you also imply that this change is instant

It is not, it is hard. But it can and must be done.

and furtere more ignore the oprresion and sumitance requiered to reach that point

I've been over this many times.

'submission'

yeah you said that communsim will stomp shit

By your qualifications for what that word means, of course it's inescapable.