Shared this video on the separatists channel

what is separatists channel

No

Its a new leftypol that is broke up with the other leftypol

They are the separatist abomination

Im looking for a link

yes

one day old

All of the lack discipline and authority

Snow told me they just got kicked out because of shilling and power abuse by one of the mods. What a pitty situation - the leaders of the separatist have to get a new syndicalist server because of power abuse.

Because it does

People were trained by Soros SJW filth

In schools

unis

at home

from tv

Now its everywhere

the degenration is taking place

both 6 and 9 wired to itself without expansion or exit

This is better representation

I know your name

the separatist channel is better cause the original channel got a dictator

snow was a total dick to the original owner and spread a bunch of false bullshit about how he was a pedo

so then it was remade, with a proper council system of ownership

theres like, 3 tiers of admin, which i think are, high council, middle council and low council

the high council is the owner, which rotates among members of the middle council

and everyone is allowed to vote to promote or demote people

@Deleted User you probably didn't read the article on the illusions of democracy. The new server is going to have even more problems. Power abuse, chaos, syndicalism and separatism is a systematical flow of democratic centralism system you've got. http://proriv.ru/articles.shtml/podguzov?nauc_centr_1_eng

"Democratic centralism as a source of opportunism in the Communist Party"

and if things do get worse ill leave

that doesnt mean its cured

im just saying, a definite asshole is worse than a maybe

@Deleted User you shouldn't just leave. You have to fight to cure it. Do not run away from problem. Fix the problem.

how though

the dudes not gonna give admin to someone who disagrees with him

besides, they just stole the power from him by rebuilding things elsewhere

so in a way its not that bad

So is there a guarantee against degeneration and collapse of the Communist Party

Therefore, we can say that, Marxism managed to prove that progressive development of communist organizations and the dictatorship of the working class are unavoidable, and at the same time, this theoretical concept and objective laws were not enough for individuals raised and educated in the centuries-old feudal-bourgeois traditions. It's unfortunate that, for the same reason, the pedagogical community of the USSR rejected achievements of pedagogical systems of Makarenko and Frunze on the communist education of the youth. Almost the entire system of education in the USSR was built by bourgeois teachers of secondary and high schools on the basis of the most primitive elements of Ushinsky pedagogical system.

Nevertheless, there is no doubt, that the most important practical and theoretical contribution to the development of the world communist movement in the XX century made the CPSU of Leninist-Stalinist period. In the 1950-s the USSR was closer than any other nation of the world to the practice of Communism building. This experience was the most representative, the most substantive, the most dynamic, the most useful. As the example of a “classical British capitalism” was enough to discover the absolute economic laws of motion of the capitalist system in general, this experience was enough to specify the absolute laws of the Communist Party and communist society development. The strength of Stalin`s socialism in the USSR was enough to get through a decade of Khrushchev's primitivism and twenty years of Brezhnev`s stagnation, and at the same time to hold the status of a superpower, having military-strategic parity with NATO.

The analysis of the CPSU history leads to the conclusion that the history has two branches - ascending and descending.

The existence of the ASCENDING branch in the history of the CPSU is proved by the constant growth of the authority and influence of the Bolsheviks among the working class and the peasantry, by the failures of many force action efforts taken by the oligarchs all over the world to defeat the Soviet Union. It turned out that even the joint military power of the Entente and Germany with Poland, all Russian nobility and the bourgeoisie, was not enough to overthrow the power of the Bolshevist Soviets at the beginning of its formation. During this period, neither economic blockade nor sabotage of the nobles, intellectuals, Western experts nor corruptive effect of the New Economic Policy (NEP) did not bring the results desired by the international anti-communism.

The existence of the ASCENDING branch in the history of the CPSU is also proved by the victory of the USSR in the war against European fascism, while democratic colonial countries of the West condoned fascism for years.

Until the mid-60s, i.e. until Kosygin reform, nobody in the world could say about the scientific, educational and technological backwardness of the Soviet Union. Research in near-Earth space still use Soviet technologies of the 50s, while the American lunar and near-Earth programs collapsed, burying 16 astronauts, i.e. four died American astronauts versus one died Soviet cosmonaut. Today, all countries deliver the astronauts on the ISS, using, practically, the Soviet space rockets, although, the number of the satellites, crashed into the ocean naturally grows as far as Russia turns into the market country.

However, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the CPSU prove the existence of the DESCENDING branch in the history of the party. And if we focus on the “economic” indicators, we will have to admit that its systematic decline began with Khrushchev's seven-year plan, became stable with the beginning of the Kosygin reform and crashed after Andropov`s election as General Secretary of the CPSU, i.e. since initiated by him the transit of the USSR economy to the principle of cost accounting (khozraschet), which meant the full restoration of capitalism and the market in the USSR with all the following destructive consequences.

Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the main aspect, specific to the CPSU on the ascending phase, but for some reason had no influence on the organizational strategy within the party. However, it is clear that the weakening of a certain factor, which played a role of political immunity against opportunism on the ascending phase, led to the growth of opportunism, that turn into the party content.

It stands to reason that by 1938 the CPSU was the only party, that was able to keep for a whole decade the highest degree of centralism, based on the scientific approach to all problems solution. There were almost no people in the leading bodies of the party, who consciously and purposefully were fighting for another organizational policy. Speaking about structure, the party really began to get rid of any organized forms of the rightism and leftism. This fact played a crucial role in the victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War, in the organization of the fast recovery of socialist production and the systematic reduction of prices. Without the real centralism in the control of complex social systems there could be no effective results.