Message from @ClibtardMario
Discord ID: 333750793104654338
People want to compete and want the prospect of being able to have it better
The inflation average of US has been 3.81% since 1960, while wage growth remained at 6.26%. Therefore, real wages increased by roughly 2.50% yearly. Calling it as stagnant, as well as the increasing payroll jobs (no negative balance since 2009 crisis) as bad is just straight ignorance. @Deleted User
That's how humans are
Again, show me a system that promotes hard work better than capitalism
In fact, it's worth noting that economic liberalism as a whole promoted prosperity on places like US (until 1913), Brazil (until the end of the Empire), Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Macau and others.
for sure, I like Chile as an example
Much better economy than other south american countries
and why would they do better than a Brazil who has vast resources
Chile isn't a prime example of liberalism (widespread cronyism on AFPs) but yes indeed
It was under the pinochet rule
I live in Brazil and I'll assure you that the lack of economic liberalism failed us
Milton Friedman was involved in that economy
Brazil has had liberal governments supported by the U.S. before
the liberal government today is corrupt as fuck
Wrong.
It's a socialist government
Temer isn't even allowed to run for office!
Military government was keynesian and developmentalist
It was a government owned company that had the corruption that overthrew that lady, forgot her name
And Temer just assumed following the succession line. Anyone literate in politics knows that.
he got in through a coup and most of his cabinet is also under corruption charges
He didn't coup anyone.
oh, I get how you are now
In fact, he was democratically elected because once Rousseff was elected, he was displayed as VP on the election board
one of those dumb Brazilians who blame Rousseff for everything because they're fucking idiots who look at rich media
Wrong.
Still waiting for the dodged question: Again, show me a system that promotes hard work better than capitalism
In fact, I'm one of the few guys who read more than MSM
Temer has single-digit approval ratings
So did Dilma.
no one elected him to be president
at least she was voted in
she was actually less corrupt than most of the other politicians
He was placed as VP by Dilma herself, and he was displayed on election board.
She wasn't.
which was a mistake by her
''she should have been more corrupt'' lmao
never trust a liberal
She placed Lula da Silva as one of her ministers to block him from prison
(he was our president from 2002 to 2010 and a pretty corrupt one btw)