Message from @ClibtardMario

Discord ID: 333750370293514240


2017-07-09 23:20:26 UTC  

want to get richer? you won't

2017-07-09 23:20:32 UTC  

How was the mobility in the socialist countries?

2017-07-09 23:20:32 UTC  

as a whole, it's impossible

2017-07-09 23:20:44 UTC  

there wasn't mobility because that wasn't the god damn fucking point

2017-07-09 23:20:51 UTC  

What system do you propose that is better than capitalism in terms of mobility

2017-07-09 23:20:54 UTC  

it was to get rid of classes, you incipient moron

2017-07-09 23:21:00 UTC  

So no one moves up?\

2017-07-09 23:21:05 UTC  

every other system, basically

2017-07-09 23:21:08 UTC  

Do you understand humans at all?

2017-07-09 23:21:10 UTC  

capitalism has very little mobility

2017-07-09 23:21:19 UTC  

what the fuck is up?

2017-07-09 23:21:22 UTC  

more so than in any alternative

2017-07-09 23:21:37 UTC  

People want to compete and want the prospect of being able to have it better

2017-07-09 23:21:42 UTC  

The inflation average of US has been 3.81% since 1960, while wage growth remained at 6.26%. Therefore, real wages increased by roughly 2.50% yearly. Calling it as stagnant, as well as the increasing payroll jobs (no negative balance since 2009 crisis) as bad is just straight ignorance. @Deleted User

2017-07-09 23:21:43 UTC  

That's how humans are

2017-07-09 23:22:33 UTC  

Again, show me a system that promotes hard work better than capitalism

2017-07-09 23:23:53 UTC  

In fact, it's worth noting that economic liberalism as a whole promoted prosperity on places like US (until 1913), Brazil (until the end of the Empire), Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Macau and others.

2017-07-09 23:24:13 UTC  

for sure, I like Chile as an example

2017-07-09 23:24:28 UTC  

Much better economy than other south american countries

2017-07-09 23:24:39 UTC  

and why would they do better than a Brazil who has vast resources

2017-07-09 23:24:49 UTC  

Chile isn't a prime example of liberalism (widespread cronyism on AFPs) but yes indeed

2017-07-09 23:25:02 UTC  

It was under the pinochet rule

2017-07-09 23:25:15 UTC  

I live in Brazil and I'll assure you that the lack of economic liberalism failed us

2017-07-09 23:25:18 UTC  

Milton Friedman was involved in that economy

2017-07-09 23:25:29 UTC  

Brazil has had liberal governments supported by the U.S. before

2017-07-09 23:25:38 UTC  

the liberal government today is corrupt as fuck

2017-07-09 23:25:46 UTC  

Wrong.

2017-07-09 23:25:48 UTC  

It's a socialist government

2017-07-09 23:25:57 UTC  

Temer isn't even allowed to run for office!

2017-07-09 23:26:01 UTC  

Military government was keynesian and developmentalist

2017-07-09 23:26:20 UTC  

It was a government owned company that had the corruption that overthrew that lady, forgot her name

2017-07-09 23:26:21 UTC  

And Temer just assumed following the succession line. Anyone literate in politics knows that.

2017-07-09 23:26:29 UTC  

Rousseff

2017-07-09 23:26:40 UTC  

he got in through a coup and most of his cabinet is also under corruption charges

2017-07-09 23:26:55 UTC  

He didn't coup anyone.

2017-07-09 23:27:02 UTC  

oh, I get how you are now

2017-07-09 23:27:22 UTC  

In fact, he was democratically elected because once Rousseff was elected, he was displayed as VP on the election board

2017-07-09 23:27:25 UTC  

one of those dumb Brazilians who blame Rousseff for everything because they're fucking idiots who look at rich media

2017-07-09 23:27:29 UTC  

Wrong.

2017-07-09 23:27:32 UTC  

Still waiting for the dodged question: Again, show me a system that promotes hard work better than capitalism

2017-07-09 23:27:41 UTC  

In fact, I'm one of the few guys who read more than MSM