Message from @ClibtardMario
Discord ID: 333755895437721600
fx?
Why not? If they're profitable
cant answer, probably something with "who's gonna be responsible"
You could assumingly point to other succesful coop companies right
since there's no owner
whats a fx bank
You can be responsible together
yeah but most companies are small
yeah but I guess banks dont like that
That's the entire idea right, profit together fail together
```whats a fx bank```
I assume they would, more chance to get tour money back than if one guy fails and declared bankrupcy
@ClibtardMario for example, banks
@Timo))) there's probabbly some legality issues with having many people responsible
probably?
Well, then I follow the opinion of the capitalist comrade over here: if it gives profits, why deny loans?
how so?
yes I'm not a bank
Heck, they can actually go to a social credit union instead
I'm neither a lawyer
Then you can't really make that argument since it seems it wouldn't be an issue
you're right, I don't see why it would be a problem but apparently it is
I'm no bank as I said
I think the issue is that those companies simply don't succeed like the regular companies do
Then it's not a problem
I don't see anything that would dispute it
If you can't go to a bank, you can ask for a loan on social credit unions
@Timo))) I'm having a bit of trouble finding the paper atm, but I am pretty sure coops have much better life-expectancy
At the cost of lower earnings but at a lower failure rate
I'd believe that 100 percent
But for our entire country to run on that system oesnt make sens
well, except for the non-existant owner wages are fine
More sense to allow it in a capitalistic system, which it does
That's why freedom is so good
why doesnt it make sense?
there is litterally more freedom to coops than an enterprise
More sense to allow it to happen than enfore it for everyone
since the decisions are democratic
I want a freedom to choose a coop OR go for myself
Only capitalim provides that