so gladly

gj

51% of people instead of nearly nonr

traditional gender roles ftw

*none

cooking while shitposting is a very healthy dynamic

@Flavaflavius das naive m8

i wish i could be like that

tfw doesnt know how to cook because of lolbertarian parents

rip

Boi how? @Apollo'sJest

anyone here an-cap

@Flavaflavius money and media wins elections 90% of the time

if not more

for democracy to succeed, a majority of people must be wise; for a monarchy to succeed, one man must be wise. Which is more likely?

anrachy is a lack of system. it's essentially just unselfaware absolutism.

monarchy probably

@Apollo'sJest thank you

most people are fucking retarded in my book

@(((lmao))) You're welcome.... I guess...

You hit the nail on the head

Monarchy's typical opposite is republicanism not democracy to be exact

see, the only democracies that have ever flourished have been of an aristocratic nature

@Apollo'sJest i'm having french revolution ptsd damnit

>Assuming the one in charge will be the one who is wise

you mean republics, but I'm beng an anal cunt

Yeah, republics are best choice, thought that's what you means

im not sure where we draw the line between democracy and republic tbh

*meant

Republics have the added flaw of being really damn unstable

historically

yeah

Corporate meritocratic absolute monarchy tbh

or simply easy to pervert

I'd argue true democracy is more unstable

Australia is a perfect example of a democracy that isn't a republic

Look at the suggested videos

the American republic stayed sufficient for brief period of time before a civil war happened and it effectively became a democracy

@Apache14 Republic - a government system where more than one person is the source of power. Democracy - taking decisions through vote.

One is a gov system

the other a method of decision making