Message from kriegsmariner VA in /leftypol/ International #english

2018-01-31 18:10:55 UTC  

Kim il Sung

2018-01-31 18:11:23 UTC  

Cordreanu believed in legionaireism, something I doubt you know anything about.

2018-01-31 18:11:51 UTC  

clerical fascism

2018-01-31 18:12:03 UTC  

and yes a good friend of mine is a romanian fash

2018-01-31 18:12:21 UTC  

And, you are only giving me a list of non marxists, nothing that confirms your belief.

2018-01-31 18:12:50 UTC  

non marxists that would agree that private property is capitalist

2018-01-31 18:13:10 UTC  

you're grasping at straws

2018-01-31 18:13:13 UTC  

That is quite the generalization there.

2018-01-31 18:13:31 UTC  

And, I would disagree with you.

2018-01-31 18:14:33 UTC  

clerical fascism, italian, falange etc

2018-01-31 18:14:40 UTC  

were all derived from sorel

2018-01-31 18:14:54 UTC  


2018-01-31 18:15:26 UTC  

Sorel is what turned mussolini away from the reds

2018-01-31 18:15:42 UTC  

I don't think evola or mousillini even mentioned sorel in their interviews.

2018-01-31 18:16:38 UTC  

Mussolini went to Sorels funeral

2018-01-31 18:16:44 UTC  


2018-01-31 18:17:02 UTC  

Sorel approved of mussolini for his syndicalist views

2018-01-31 18:17:04 UTC  

Didn't hitler attend some of the RAF funerals?

2018-01-31 18:17:36 UTC  

Cultured Thug did a whole presentation on Sorel and his link to fascism

2018-01-31 18:18:05 UTC  

So in that case, woulden't he be fascist?

2018-01-31 18:19:09 UTC  

Sorel is often considered a proto-fascist

2018-01-31 18:19:23 UTC  

but he's a weird one he'd go back and forth from being an ansyn to natsyn

2018-01-31 18:20:40 UTC  

Okay? If he was ultimately considered a fascist and a national syndicalist, then why would you even cite him as a socialist?

2018-01-31 18:21:15 UTC  

because syndicalism is a form of socialism

2018-01-31 18:24:06 UTC  

>Falangists destroy CNT FAI
>Mousillini purges communists and anarchists

2018-01-31 18:24:37 UTC  

because they were'nt the same kind of socialists

2018-01-31 18:24:43 UTC  

By that definition, WW2 was leftist infighting.

2018-01-31 18:25:02 UTC  

and radically different views on social issues

2018-01-31 18:27:06 UTC  

Fascism is not a left or right worldview

2018-01-31 18:28:40 UTC  

Now hold on, there is no way that a socialist would be somebody like cordreanu, or mousillini, because, they fight for both their race, and nation, and an economy that benefits the NATION.

2018-01-31 18:29:37 UTC  

their economies were syndicalist

2018-01-31 18:29:41 UTC  

de facto socialism

2018-01-31 18:31:14 UTC  

So you call it socialist, but in reality it is just yours by claim?

2018-01-31 18:33:05 UTC  

its not marxist socialism

2018-01-31 18:33:08 UTC  

but its socialism

2018-01-31 18:33:49 UTC  

every great nationalist movement has had some socialist ideals if not a very socialist economy

2018-01-31 18:34:34 UTC  

every great socialist state has been somewhat nationalistic if not atleast patriotic

2018-01-31 19:17:36 UTC  

To the fascist state comes first but had syndicalist economies

2018-01-31 19:18:11 UTC  

So you then admit that national socialism IS socialism? You have no good reason to believe that socialism means that workers own everything, and afterall, the people you have provided have worked against you, because some allowed private production methods, meaning that national socialism has every reason to call itself socialism.

2018-01-31 19:18:50 UTC  

To the socialist the likes of Stalin, Mao, Kim il sung etc class came first but had very strong patriotism and nationalism

2018-01-31 19:19:08 UTC  

That is true.