You're weak and effeminate. A cuck clinging to the romanticized notion of the "Great Man" in the hopes that you might live vicariously through other men.

? A wannabe kulak?

Any of y'all tuning into UFC 222

"You're weak and effeminate. A cuck clinging to the romanticized notion of the "Great Man" in the hopes that you might live vicariously through other men."

White people are treated like total shit in south africa.

Gonna frame this

Why not just kulak

@Comrade Skeltal >Because they were being oppressed and were being overwhelmed, they destroy the infradtructure and food supplies that their enemies want

And what necessarily do you not like about that? It is how civil war like this has always played out?

Yup @Mr.E#2794

You're weak and effeminate. A cuck clinging to the romanticized notion of the "Great Man" in the hopes that you might live vicariously through other men.

Just cause it applies so well

Lol

What's this debate about.

@Irish Fella There is no debate.

He's debating by himself then ?

We're not debating, I was complaining about modern kulaks

And these guys decided to uh,

@Deleted User Thanks for the amazing quote, commander cool.

Ahh

Complain against my complaint

What's a modern kulak?

@Deleted User You're welcome, Cock Commander.

Apparently its an American man who thinks he'd be Rambo if he was a white South African

Or well not American

Never heard of a kulak tbh.

Kulaks were those who attempted to sabotage soviet agricultural policy during and after the October revolution

Basically they hoarded food, poisoned land and water, and did their very best to avoid collectivization, to the detriment of millions

Which is essentially what the asshat in the meme has said he'd do

Cause despite his owning private property, that of which would be stolen if he was a white South African, his right to hold it is somehow more valuable than the rest of the country's right to food, or decency, or right not to have their environment raped by poor agricultural policy :l

@Comrade Skeltal Hmm, if my knowledge is correct, wasn't this after lenin privatized land again, and stalin started acting like a dick towards them, and stole all of their food and left them high and dry while a famine was occuring? Woulden't there be a causius beli to rebel, if they were having all of their food taken, while a famine was occuring, with no compensation at all, and only hostility from the soviet gov?

Sorry but this isnt a Paradox Game,

And he took their food for hoarding

And

I'm still talking about South Africa, cause I dont care for Stalin.

He was shite

So because they were stocking on food due to the famine, they forcefully had it taken from them?

But he also wasnt a kulak

Wew.

The famine they were causing, via sabotage

And you know

HOARDING