>shot
>night of long KNIVES

Yes and why? Because he was vaguely left leaning and somewhat anti capitalist

@Deleted User Nope, it's because he was marxist and was influencing the SA.

Strasser = Marxist

my sides

How wasen't he?

Not to mention increased capital returns, better performance of stock markets, increased privatization, selling of slave labor to private ownership like Ford.

*anti-capitalism intensifies*

he didn't follow any element of marxism
including the commodity form or the LTV
he was just vaguely anti-cap

@Deleted User And? How is privatization inherently capitalist?

Strasser wasn’t a Marxist, he was clearly a reformist if he was even remotely Socialist.

"privatization isn't capitalist"
wot

@Deleted User Because Capitalism, is private ownership over the means of production

like lmao

private ownership of industry is the definition of capitalism

I thought this guy knew what he was talking about at least a little bit

@Deleted User And? Because capitalism preferably uses privitization does not make privatization inherently capitalist.

@DA GOMMIE JOO Wrong.

it's not like privatization is socialist

@Deleted User It is the literal definition used in even liberal economics.

@Deleted User Show me the definition.

privatization is only found in capitalism

"trade and industry are controlled by private owners"

Wrong, it is used in democratic socialism, fedualism, tribalism, leninism, and chinese socialism.

>chinese socialism isn't capitalist
my sides

@DA GOMMIE JOO And there is the achilles heel to this.... "....for profit".

look at this unruhe fanboy

"industry is privately owned"

@DA GOMMIE JOO "for profit".

@Deleted User Again, for greatest possible profit....

yes and companies like krupp and messerschmidt made profits

Just because your markets are directed by the state and the profit is used by the state, doesn’t mean it’s not Capitalism

You know how profit works right?

@DA GOMMIE JOO Nope, under national socialism private businesses run not for profit but to benefit the state, profit comes second.

how do you “benefit” the state? With the profit your market creates, idiot

corporations didn't support NS because they loved the state
they did it because they made profit

@Deleted User Nope, but with the products and services that your business creates.

@DA GOMMIE JOO And? Their first priority was to benefit the state, they only made profit in the process of doing so.

they made profits though

As long as you have commodity production and markets, in which costumers pay money to buy things, it is capitalism. If products are sold on the market they can’t be simultaneously be free welfare.