Message from @Firefly
Discord ID: 318659418755563520
No, because communism requires unnatural equality. Socialism however can be used in a fascist state.
@Deleted User what is socialism?
The means of production are owned by society, or rather by the proles
@Deleted User that is not true
Define socialism
You like Marxist definition?
Go ahead
Socialism is a first stage of communism by Marxist definition.
That's a good reason to dislike the 'marxist definition's of these things
That is simplistic and gives no light to what exactly the policy of that economic system would be
I don't see how even the most pious communist could accept a mere
>IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF CAPITALISM
tier definition
At all
@Deleted User there is no need. Anything that leads to communism is socialism.
@Deleted User yes, but as an admin I do not engage in personal conversions. Plus my favorite wify is sleepy besides me.
true
Socialism can be different
There is no need to be specific.
@Deleted User Most communist in Russia do not believe they will live in communism.
The purpose is not based on what is immediate
The goal is to make classless society
Very end
Socialism is the path
To communism
Nothing else
You make a program
The Party makes
No, I'm pro-aristocracy
Marxism-Leninism
I think we can do it with or without aristocracy.
But I'm pro
Yes
Yes
Can be used
To gain more control for Party
USSR funded more fundamental science than the whole world
That is true
But USSR funded more
USSR had 1/4th of all scientist in the world
Merchant propaganda
Every merchant is to go to gulag