@Deleted User that is why I shouldn't use my definition of Fascism?

Yes, because the definition you gave me implies fascism is based around capitalism, which is untrue

@Deleted User show me Fascism in anarchist society.

If it is not based in capitalism

Anarchism and fascism couldn't coincide because there is no order in anarchy

@Deleted User so it is not based in anarchy?

It cannot be

What about communism, can fascism be based in communism?

No, because communism requires unnatural equality. Socialism however can be used in a fascist state.

@Deleted User what is socialism?

The means of production are owned by society, or rather by the proles

@Deleted User that is not true

Define socialism

You like Marxist definition?

Go ahead

Socialism is a first stage of communism by Marxist definition.

That's a good reason to dislike the 'marxist definition's of these things

That is simplistic and gives no light to what exactly the policy of that economic system would be

I don't see how even the most pious communist could accept a mere
>IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF CAPITALISM
tier definition

At all

@Deleted User there is no need. Anything that leads to communism is socialism.

@Deleted User yes, but as an admin I do not engage in personal conversions. Plus my favorite wify is sleepy besides me.

true

Socialism can be different

There is no need to be specific.

@Deleted User Most communist in Russia do not believe they will live in communism.

The purpose is not based on what is immediate

The goal is to make classless society

In the end

Very end

Socialism is the path

To communism

Nothing else

You make a program

The Party makes

No, I'm pro-aristocracy

Marxism-Leninism

I think we can do it with or without aristocracy.

But I'm pro

Yes

Yes