Message from @cmad
Discord ID: 588975856144351234
Nevertheless, his treatise still has value
Locke didnt negate leviathan lol
Who cares whether he has polemicised or not, just read the source material
Does anybody know some good books/literature about National Syndicalism ? .
i am interested in learning more about it
im going to start a political action group
im **heavily** interested cloning. human cloning in particular. and Gene Splicing if anyone is interested in my ideas come to room 1 or dm me
<@&552573071878258694>
👌🏻
<:Honkler:552578459516272673>
tits for presidante
ok
move here without these retard
s
Believing in a communist society has the same merit as believing in an Aryan supernation, their theories cannot come to fruition because they are not based in reality. Dialectical materialism is a poor way to describe history because it doesn't account for a plethora of other factors that cause history to ebb and flow
dialects considers every factor in the progression of society
Religion, weather, social norms etc. Dialectics only refers to the class structure, in terms of marxism
Organization of an economic system can in theory be changed and succeed
danny
please
let me take this
However this loose nonsense idea of Aryans and racial superiority is nothing more than wishful thinking
That is all
No, historical materialism is a thing as well. Historical materialism considers all of these things interconnected, all of each of these factors exist as a factor of the progression of history, for example we can see religion is changed through the social conditions of the time, social norms are the largest determining factor in many of these. Also how does weather have anything to do with economic progression wtf? History is not a progression of accidents. We see that dialectically as I have already stated these things are factors as well, we see these factors usually shift off of the social conditions, which is determined by the economic conditions. As Stalin says on the interconnectivity of nature; ```Contrary to metaphysics, dialects does not regard nature as an accidental agglomeration of things, of phenomena, disconnected with, isolated from, and independent of, each other, but as a connected and integral whole, in such things phenomena are organically connected with, dependent on, and determined by each other,.```
@cmad fascists can't read that much
You're scarring them
lmao
This still doesn't address the fact that there is not historical precedent for a global communist society. There isn't even precedent for a national communist society. You are taking a big leap in logic by inferring that this stateless global order must form because of previous changes in the mode of production.
*national communist society*
Society will change, but not in the drastic leap that communists believe will happen
Unless you hand control of the means of production to AI, then you may have a better argument
Woah
But that wouldn't be communism then because the proletarian would not exist
We have a transhumanist
I'm talking about theory, even then I haven't done much research about a global AI order haha