Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 584454049089454140
But we won gold in hockey so
<:SquidDab:479097431586504724>
This wouldn't have happened if Luther had been executed before he was able to get up to any real trouble. Just sayin'.
Luther was the Catholic Church's fault imo
@Deleted User christianity ruined europe in my opinion
No he wasn't.
Christianity is stupid
Years of corruption
In any case
Decades to be exact
Too many popes
Even tho my fav writer says christianity is most important thing
@Deleted User Actually, it did quite the opposite: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL57857981F3CC5D78
Too much Simony
@Deleted User hooktube?
Fishing dating site?
@Deleted User romans and greeks > catholics
@Deleted User https://hooktube.com is an alternative front end for YouTube. It's nice because with it you get just the video and no ads or any other bullshit like that.
But catholics were lit af
Too bad they made muslims take byzantinium
The Catholics didn't do that, the muslims took Byzantium as jihad. They would've done it even if Catholicism wasn't a thing.
@Deleted User weakend by catholics
Also islam is the worst religion
No, it was weakened by a major war between the Greeks and Persians, who had been fighting since forever, and a loss of 1/3 of its population to the black plague.
@Deleted User do you know the part where crusaders pillaged them
That's a myth. It didn't actually happen.
Excuseme?
<:ThinkingPepe:552577932699238400>
<:MonkaHmm:552577952089636875>
<a:HyperThonkSpin:548199306943922176>
<a:fghjkl:548199114203201537>
Another myth is the idea that Luther had any concerns about corruption or bad priests in the Catholic Church, and even if he did then he could've reported them to their higher ups in the hierarchy and got them expelled from the Church and then replaced with better clergymen, and that would've been the end of it. There was no need to start a revolution over it. The fact that he did decide to start a revolution shows that obviously he had a different goal in mind:
In his paper, De servo arbitrio (On the Bondage of the Will), Luther considered that "the dogma of free will" has no foundation in scripture and, therefore, has to be "completely abandoned and counted amongst fairy tales". In a letter to Erasmus of Rotterdam, Luther praises Erasmus for not afflicting him "with those strange things about the papacy, Purgatory, indulgences, and the like," but instead "detecting the CARDINAL POINT," and "attacking the MAIN THING itself." What is the "main thing" that Luther is talking about? It is Luther’s opinion "that free will is a pure lie."
The idea that corruption or bad priests was a concern for him is one that was made up long after his time.
@Deleted User not talking about him tho
<:eh:525794230812016640>
@Deleted User also Luther never wanted lutherism
Yes he did. He was very clear about it.
Hes followers were retarded
No, you need to brush up on your history.
He wanted to reform catholism
No he didn't. He couldn't have been more clear about that fact.
Maybe my school was wrong idk