Message from @Tempsky

Discord ID: 644785854379851776


2019-11-15 06:23:05 UTC  

You are wasting my time like this.

2019-11-15 06:23:25 UTC  

What do you want me to agree on?

2019-11-15 06:23:55 UTC  

Provide a claim with evidence or fuck off.

2019-11-15 06:24:05 UTC  

what evidence

2019-11-15 06:24:09 UTC  

@Kyger plus stuff like drones, unguided and semi-guided mass missle attacks ect

2019-11-15 06:24:17 UTC  

I asked you a queston

2019-11-15 06:24:39 UTC  

those usually go hand in hand with the others I outlined

2019-11-15 06:24:50 UTC  

intervening in a region by proxy lobbing a couple missiles in

2019-11-15 06:24:54 UTC  

SCUDS are fairly cheap, main battle tanks and aircraft carriers are expensive and fairly easy to destroy

2019-11-15 06:25:50 UTC  

future of warfare is either solely spec ops insertions and proxy shit

2019-11-15 06:26:38 UTC  

@Korewa Krusader Left the building

2019-11-15 06:26:43 UTC  

And that spec ops stuff can go wrong

2019-11-15 06:27:32 UTC  

See what happened during the Iran Hostage crisis

2019-11-15 06:27:44 UTC  

yeah but it's way better in the long run

2019-11-15 06:27:52 UTC  

And it looks bad in the press, especially when it's like blackops shit

2019-11-15 06:28:07 UTC  

People are trying to say Mercs are the future

2019-11-15 06:28:12 UTC  

But look at Yemen

2019-11-15 06:28:24 UTC  

better a hit and run w/spec ops than invasions

2019-11-15 06:28:33 UTC  

easier to get classified data too

2019-11-15 06:28:39 UTC  

Saudi can't even fight fucking peasant militias

2019-11-15 06:28:47 UTC  

plus its aesthetic as fuck

2019-11-15 06:28:53 UTC  

Yemen is a mess because the Saudi's are bombing it to pieces

2019-11-15 06:29:00 UTC  

They've got all this hardware but they're fucking retards who can't use it properly

2019-11-15 06:29:30 UTC  

That's not that big a deal when you're not a developed industrialized country

2019-11-15 06:29:43 UTC  

How many bombs got dropped in NV?

2019-11-15 06:29:58 UTC  

@Korewa Krusader Dude did you even read the stuff you sent me?

2019-11-15 06:30:43 UTC  

There's a big reason why the Byzantines had so much trouble fighting the Arabs and it still kind of applies to modernity

2019-11-15 06:31:22 UTC  

Ah yes, that 1.8% increase matters so muchm

2019-11-15 06:31:28 UTC  

It doesn't help all the mercs Saudi uses are people from the Horn of Africa

2019-11-15 06:31:38 UTC  

Not like Blackwater people

2019-11-15 06:31:58 UTC  

About heritably, there were various kind of variations to IQ and so many other factors you didn't take to account at all.

There are a number of points to consider when interpreting heritability:

Heritability measures the proportion of variation in a trait that can be attributed to genes, and not the proportion of a trait caused by genes. Thus, if the environment relevant to a given trait changes in a way that affects all members of the population equally, the mean value of the trait will change without any change in its heritability (because the variation or differences among individuals in the population will stay the same). This has evidently happened for height: the heritability of stature is high, but average heights continue to increase.[15] Thus, even in developed nations, a high heritability of a trait does not necessarily mean that average group differences are due to genes.[15][16] Some have gone further, and used height as an example in order to argue that "even highly heritable traits can be strongly manipulated by the environment, so heritability has little if anything to do with controllability."[17]

2019-11-15 06:32:12 UTC  

@Korewa Krusader A common error is to assume that a heritability figure is necessarily unchangeable. The value of heritability can change if the impact of environment (or of genes) in the population is substantially altered.[15] If the environmental variation encountered by different individuals increases, then the heritability figure would decrease. On the other hand, if everyone had the same environment, then heritability would be 100%. The population in developing nations often has more diverse environments than in developed nations.[citation needed] This would mean that heritability figures would be lower in developing nations. Another example is phenylketonuria which previously caused mental retardation for everyone who had this genetic disorder and thus had a heritability of 100%. Today, this can be prevented by following a modified diet, resulting in a lowered heritability.

2019-11-15 06:33:02 UTC  

A high heritability of a trait does not mean that environmental effects such as learning are not involved. Vocabulary size, for example, is very substantially heritable (and highly correlated with general intelligence) although every word in an individual's vocabulary is learned. In a society in which plenty of words are available in everyone's environment, especially for individuals who are motivated to seek them out, the number of words that individuals actually learn depends to a considerable extent on their genetic predispositions and thus heritability is high.[15]
Since heritability increases during childhood and adolescence, and even increases greatly between 16–20 years of age and adulthood, one should be cautious drawing conclusions regarding the role of genetics and environment from studies where the participants are not followed until they are adults. Furthermore, there may be differences regarding the effects on the g-factor and on non-g factors, with g possibly being harder to affect and environmental interventions disproportionately affecting non-g factors.[18]
Polygenic traits often appear less heritable at the extremes. A heritable trait is definitionally more likely to appear in the offspring of two parents high in that trait than in the offspring of two randomly selected parents. However, the more extreme the expression of the trait in the parents, the less likely the child is to display the same extreme as the parents. At the same time, the more extreme the expression of the trait in the parents, the more likely the child is to express the trait at all. For example, the child of two extremely tall parents is likely to be taller than the average person (displaying the trait), but unlikely to be taller than the two parents (displaying the trait at the same extreme).

2019-11-15 06:33:02 UTC  

Reread that slowly. I did read thism

2019-11-15 06:33:33 UTC  

It doesn't say what you think it does.

2019-11-15 06:36:20 UTC  

Okay, now onto racial differences in IQ related genes Lynnnsnd Vanhanen (2012)

2019-11-15 06:37:13 UTC  

Lynn*

2019-11-15 06:38:15 UTC  

But you understand, what I was pointing out was it isn't just a given just on the basses of certain inate qualities based on race I'll explain you piece by piece

It makes a strong case of social conditions which I was pointing out to
Such effects of IQ was generally even based on the characteristics of a person, on his ability to learn
Many more factors on heritably
My pointing out this to you is that, I wasn't guaranteeing everything based on race but many more characteristics in general. Than a supposition on the heredity element

All of this was taken from here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ#Caveats

2019-11-15 06:38:22 UTC  
2019-11-15 06:38:58 UTC  

Nope, you don't even know what it is about.