It seems that YT has scrubbed it

Yeah but I don't know whether the Government is trying to pin down McVeigh with Pierce.
I just think it's an intentional attempt of the government to try to link white nationalism with McVeigh and terrorism which I think is not true.
McVeigh was against socialism and government tyranny but I don't think he believed in white nationalism.
He strongly stood for the constitution, at least that's what I believe.

Sure would love to listen to the book, wanted to for long time, but never really got to it.
It would be really nice to hear the audiobook in Pierce's own words.
I think was pierce was somewhat right about the race warfare but I to read to know more. I just know some stuff vaguely about it.

.

.

Though about Alexander Pierce, I don't know whether I should fully trust as I am not a believer is White Nationalism, I sometimes do think fiction of his sort might help to understand stuff, but I wouldn't take every thing his interpretation to be final.
He was right about the Jews and how White people were treated, I pretty much agree a lot on what he says.
But the racist and racial elements I disagree with.
There is this element the polarize the American people which I am not a part of.
I want people to understand it each other, and not divide, it's already got worse and more so through propaganda, than actually knowing one another in person.
Ideological warfare is a part to create areas where consensus and agreement becomes null.
And it's intentional
Look who makes the profit out of it, the media,
various groups and organizations who benefit of divide on the most trifling issues, instead of the real ones, which you really have is the decreasing of liberty and more and more control of your lives. Whatever the means may be.
I just had to point this out, to make my point.

why are we responding "."

I wasn't paying attention

on what I think of this

@Kyger You need a special role for Le Capitalist.

Maybe: "got an F in special ed."

<:ClownFlushed:552585951101321246>

@Prometheus fascism in America doesn't have to be a lame copy of German fascism

I know, that I did not consider it as such.

@Korewa Krusader Instead of personal insults can you argue on something real.

There's no blood and soil basis for the kind of fascism that occured in Germany

right

I have heard that side too

Thus the pivot to either 3%er purist settler republicanism

Or the attempt to cobble together a broad coalition of mutually-interested groups

This is dated but broadly true for the time it was written

@Yung_$ouichi AmNatSoc > European fascism

but you must understand, there are a lot of aspects how you can look at Nazi Germany Rule.
If you look at is just pure nationalism it would be mistake.
And don't forget where Fascism comes from
It's from Mussolini, under the the Vatican Catholic Church the origins of Fascism.
I could so much in detail, but I know no one has the patience to read.
Also the constitution element of the first amendment may cause you problems .

separation of church and state

Was so that no ideological position could be above the enforce it's own doctrine

Now I respect where most and all of you white nationalists come. I know many of you are patriots which I respect greatly.
But the insistence white identity is the only thing I move away from. Try to understand, I'm not taking an antagonistic position against you.

I have different values that is all

only portraying my side of the argument

American national socialism is gonna Ugandans being America First trying to keep Ghanaese immigrants out

I can't imagine someone named Fuentes being the face of popular US right populism even 20 years ago

Fascism in it's classical form is more akin to a version of utopian socialism

Like Sorel or something

Fuentes reminds me more of the truth movement in some aspects, while keeping white people in the center, which I think completely right, and his concerns are well founded.

I agree with you about Fascism in it's classical form. I don't have any disagreements there.

I want to know properly, can you define the Fascism in the modern term you use? I want to have more knowledge in that regard.

I know Richard Spencer's version, which I partly agree with.

But I want to know what you guys think of it

I'm in the opposing camp but it depends tbh

Fascism in the periphery and in the core take different forms

If you want a different perspective

I see, I understand thank you for the info.

Yay!

This is my sona guys

nice phase you will look back at in 10 years and reflect on

🤢