and it's true the banks do beat them up but even if they didn't it would still be shit cuz niggers lol

Well obviously but it shouldn't be this poor. Jews ruin everything

They curropt and destroy these countries so that they come to the west looking for opportunities which kills us in the process

By taking down Qaddafi they were able to destabilize the region creating more chaos, which lead to refugee crisi. Qaddafi even has a quote saying something along the lines of "I'm the only one holding these people back"

Yeah he predicted all this apparently I need to watch the video

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/40633487/getting-groped-is-just-part-of-a-normal-night-out

@everyone are we doing anything to challenge the public claim by NJ that we're terrorist?

NJ?

State of New Jersey

We should

We need to

I have a lawyer that will help

She offered her services

The longer it goes unchallenged, the more cause they have for it to have the illusion of truth. Our demand should be that a public apology be issued by NJ for villifying us for exercising our right of free speech.

Do you want to talk her billy

Yes

But, @Thomas Ryan I ask leadership to comment on this. PM if need be.

Did they actually state we were terrorists? I thought it was just a list of fringe groups that Posobiec slapped the label onto?

If it's a positive claim issued by a government agency, it should be treated as serious. They have no authority to make "suggestive" gestures.

That's defamation. If they make the claim, the burden of proof is on them to establish their reasoning.

Let's find the page that supposedly mentioned it then.

Sheeit

What's going on?

we turrist now apparently

makes sense

NJ recently labeled antifa a terrorist org

and, as we know

the alt-right and the SJWs are exactly the same

@Thomas Ryan here is one thing that needs to be challenged as well.

https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa?rq=antifa

You want to challenge someone calling us white supremacists?

https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/the-face-of-white-supremacy-in-2017

Not "someone". But a government agency should be challenged. MSM, ADL, SPLC, etc are all private organizations. They get plausible deniability by claiming, "That's our opinion." It's a cowardly move. But, they get to play with sophistry like that. Government, on the other hands, does not. They're bound to the rule of law -- which is a philosophical position. i.e. They're bound to logic and reason.

In order for them to make these claims, they have to substantiate their position.

For example: We are not a white supremacist group. White nationalists at best.

So you propose sending them an email? Or making a big stink about it, playing the victim card?

No sir, we would be challenging their claim in order to set the record straight. The burden of proof is on them to substantiate their claims.

They're calling us out.

Claim 1: "Traditional White Supremacist Organizations Attempt to “Rebrand” Re-stating claim 1: "New Generation of White Supremacists"

Via what lines of communication would we challenge their claim?