Message from @Azzmador

Discord ID: 336213731572973568


2017-07-16 18:17:40 UTC  

no, first I've heard of it.

2017-07-16 18:19:16 UTC  

1) Extend familial love to brothers in arms, first above all.
2) Extend kinship love to the polity
3) Extirpate hatred from the human heart.
4) Show tolerance of honest error, intolerance of all else; and respect for those who earn it, and disrespect for those who don't. Kneel to none.
5) Speak the truth without exception.
6) Master an art, a science, a craft, and a trade.
7) Bear and raise children to be husbands and warriors and wives and mothers.
8) Preserve, Maintain and Beautify the commons
9) Safeguard the young, weak, and elderly.
10) Take nothing not paid for, seek nothing not earned.
11) Place no burden of notice, attention or impediment upon others.
12) Perform and enforce restitution for all wrongs.
13) Punish or kill the criminal, wicked, and lazy.
14) Defeat and exterminate all enemies completely
15) Leave life having transcended yourself, your line, your polity, man, and this land, closer to omniscience, omnipotence, sovereignty, and beauty.

2017-07-16 18:19:27 UTC  

I found this list somewhere and thought it was pretty good

2017-07-16 18:20:32 UTC  

I don't know what the purpose of #3 is.

2017-07-16 18:20:57 UTC  

Idk lol

2017-07-16 18:21:02 UTC  

"Genghis Khan was a tengrist, but was religiously tolerant and interested in learning philosophical and moral lessons from other religions. He consulted Buddhist monks, Muslims, Christian missionaries, and the Taoist monk Qiu Chuji.[30]

Genghis Khan, and the following Yuan Emperors forbade Islamic practices like Halal butchering, forcing Mongol methods of butchering animals on Muslims, and other restrictive degrees continued. Muslims had to slaughter sheep in secret.[31] Genghis Khan directly called Muslims and Jews "slaves", and demanded that they follow the Mongol method of eating rather than the halal method. Circumcision was also forbidden. Jews were also affected, and forbidden by the Mongols to eat Kosher."

2017-07-16 18:21:21 UTC  

Genghis Khan was a based anti-Muslim and anti-Jew gook

2017-07-16 18:21:32 UTC  

That's from Wikipedia btw

2017-07-16 18:21:43 UTC  

yeah, the Mongols were pretty based

2017-07-16 18:22:21 UTC  

Genghis Kahn may have had red hair and green or blue eyes

2017-07-16 18:22:43 UTC  

yeah, I've heard that. I don't believe it.

2017-07-16 18:23:10 UTC  

There was a Persian historian in the 1300s that described him as being red-haired and green-eyed, and that's one of the earliest records we have. Not necessarily reliable though.

2017-07-16 18:23:31 UTC  

I'ave been reading *The Lightning and the Sun* and it's pretty good

2017-07-16 18:28:38 UTC  

The list I found of those 15 items was, I believe, virtues that Pagan religions in Europe had in common with Christians. I don't know if hatred comes naturally to Europeans, hence the poem "The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon". The Saxon *began* to hate, it did not come naturally. Perhaps ancient Europeans were not fond of hatred, they hated because it was necessary. To extirpate hatred, one would have to extirpate the object of hatred, wouldn't they? Nothing left to hate, no hate.

2017-07-16 18:30:11 UTC  

"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its mantle of
strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis Parker Yockey,
IMPERIUM

2017-07-16 18:30:46 UTC  

Still no Georgians

2017-07-16 18:31:20 UTC  

Hatred absolutely comes naturally to us. The Jews have spent two millenia trying to purge it. Hate may be the most important attribute we ever had.

2017-07-16 18:31:45 UTC  

There is absolutely nothing wrong with hate.

2017-07-16 18:32:06 UTC  

When one lacks hate, one will not act in the interest of his race and nation

2017-07-16 18:32:26 UTC  

It is natural and good that one hates one's enemy.

2017-07-16 18:33:20 UTC  

It is unnatural and evil when Jews direct that hatred into their own interests, but teach us to feel shame when hating properly.

2017-07-16 18:33:35 UTC  

Of course. Like I said, we must elliminate our enemy to elliminate the hatred.

2017-07-16 18:34:21 UTC  

We'll still need it. Even among our own people, there will always be subversive elements and promoters of degeneracy. They must be opposed with hatred.

2017-07-16 18:34:45 UTC  

You can't love a thing and not hate it's polar opposite.

2017-07-16 18:35:17 UTC  

Just as you cannot have love without hate. Without one, the other is meaningless.

2017-07-16 18:35:37 UTC  

The purging of hatred makes ideas like love meaningless

2017-07-16 18:36:33 UTC  

In honorable warfare, one does not hate their enemies, because their enemies are fellow warriors, just on the other side. Hatred became necessary when deception became introduced to war. Hatred became necessary when the people learned to love peace and could only be roused to fight by hating. That's why Hitler is so demonized: to justify the war waged by the Allies. They have to teach us to hate the "enemy" that they want us to fight, while we naturally hate (((their ilk))) for being such vile dens of vipers.

2017-07-16 18:37:00 UTC  

You don't think Hitler hated the Jews and communists?

2017-07-16 18:37:09 UTC  

That's just not true.

2017-07-16 18:37:12 UTC  

Jews are the worlds victims

2017-07-16 18:37:30 UTC  

Theyve literally lied about their entire history

2017-07-16 18:37:48 UTC  

And there is no such thing as "honorable warfare" unless by that you mean doing whatever it takes to win.

2017-07-16 18:38:04 UTC  

That's what I'm saying, we naturally hate them because they introduced deception and trickery to war and removed all honor from it

2017-07-16 18:38:28 UTC  

Guns took a lot of honor out of warfare

2017-07-16 18:38:32 UTC  

Indeed

2017-07-16 18:38:37 UTC  

If your enemy is deserving of respect and honorable treatment, then it is a dishonorable act to make war with him.

2017-07-16 18:39:24 UTC  

When Europeans fought Europeans, before the Jew came, there was honor and (probably) not hatred.

2017-07-16 18:41:10 UTC  

When you go to war, you should always behave like beasts, killing machines. There is no place for codes and treaties and "fair treatment." War means the death of your enemy, the destruction of his ability to ever challenge you agin, the erasure of his name and legacy from history. Anything less is not a victory.

2017-07-16 18:41:46 UTC  
2017-07-16 18:42:35 UTC  

Anything less than carnage and rape on the battlefield leads to more wars. These Codes of Honor" of which you speak enabled Lords and Kings to make war for their own advantage, whenever they felt like it. The people suffer then.

2017-07-16 18:43:35 UTC  

The wars we have now are a great example. So long as the casualties aren't too high, and they don't affect the populace of whichever side is winning to a substantial degree, the wars will never end.