Message from @Goose

Discord ID: 392749248183140353


2017-12-19 06:31:18 UTC  

Why would it be so hard to find stocks that can at least slightly beat the market?

2017-12-19 06:36:29 UTC  

If it were that easy, everyone would be doing it...beating the market is basically saying beating company valuations...possible as a one off? Sure. Long term it has been shown not to work.

2017-12-19 06:37:39 UTC  

Valuations are done by very intelliegent people, experienced at what they are doing, and have far more info than 99.9% of investors

2017-12-19 06:38:36 UTC  

Yes, penny stock from the pink sheets could work out, but that is exceedingly rare

2017-12-19 06:42:01 UTC  

Everyone wouldn't be doing it because the stocks would become overbought, but, ya, some of those are good points

2017-12-19 06:44:59 UTC  

The first millionaire from the 49er Gold Rush sold the shovels ;-) True story.

2017-12-19 06:45:57 UTC  

Instead of buying Apple, maybe buy shares in the company that supplies Apple the compknents...that can build alpha

2017-12-19 06:46:47 UTC  

So, here's the thing. Index funds naturally are going to include some obviously shit stocks that drag down the average. So, would it really be that difficult to find something that is at the very least above average?

2017-12-19 11:45:13 UTC  

@Jacob I’ve been able to successfully pick individual stocks for years by watching price to earnings ratios. ETF’s that track broader markets are still your best option most of the time.

2017-12-19 12:14:35 UTC  

I'm not sure I'm agreeing with most of what's being said here... you absolutely can be successful picking stocks 😅

2017-12-19 12:16:30 UTC  

why are we acting like it's completely impossible to do technical analysis and have a successful swing trade lol

2017-12-19 12:17:04 UTC  

or even successfuly mitigate risk while capitalizing on momentum?...

2017-12-19 12:22:03 UTC  

while playing lower to mid cap things with more volatility and having trades that are on a shorter basis you're not going to win 100% of the time, nobody does. You need to have the proper entry and exit strategies so if you do lose (which you will) it's only 2-4%

2017-12-19 12:22:30 UTC  

but when you do win, it can be 3-30% percent or even more

2017-12-19 12:27:15 UTC  

like i said @Jacob join techbud solutions and go in the main voice chat during market open, that can be the best way to learn, just by observing

2017-12-19 12:29:39 UTC  

obviously Google and YouTube whatever you can too

2017-12-19 12:31:54 UTC  

and for the love of god (and your funds) before you even think about using real money... make sure you demonstrate to yourself that you actually can do this right with a papertrading account

2017-12-19 15:38:36 UTC  

Tfw threw $$$ into crypto and stocks without any research and have made a few hundred dollars

2017-12-19 15:48:58 UTC  

👎

2017-12-19 16:02:27 UTC  

Yeah, money sucks

2017-12-19 18:45:17 UTC  

whats this new currency im hearing about

2017-12-19 18:45:24 UTC  

iota or something?

2017-12-19 20:04:34 UTC  

IOTA isn't particularly new to my knowledge

2017-12-19 20:04:54 UTC  

There's probably a lot of shitcoins released every day

2017-12-19 20:05:24 UTC  
2017-12-19 22:54:57 UTC  

@Jacob thats my concern. it seem like the .com bubble

2017-12-19 22:55:13 UTC  

i think the main cryptos will absorb the smaller ones

2017-12-19 23:29:40 UTC  

cryptos can't "absorb" each other

2017-12-19 23:32:31 UTC  

I heard that Bitcoin currently consumes the power equivalent of the island of Ireland, and in 9 months is projected to rival the United States. Does that worry anyone?

2017-12-20 00:01:41 UTC  

@John O That sounds unsustainable.

2017-12-20 00:30:47 UTC  

@DCViking exactly. The whole idea that the computing power required to complete each transaction rises exponentially is insane. It's something that occurred to me a year or two ago, but I just assumed I didn't really understand how Bitcoin worked. Now that other people are talking about it, I'm more confident that the whole thing is going to become worthless

2017-12-20 00:31:10 UTC  

@Jacob Is that how all crypto works, or just Bitcoin?

2017-12-20 00:32:44 UTC  

I mean, it's theoretically possible for some big brain developer to make that happen, but I don't see what the incentive would be to go through that whole shitshow

2017-12-20 00:33:08 UTC  

I'm trying to visualize how that would even work

2017-12-20 00:34:16 UTC  

Huh?

2017-12-20 00:34:33 UTC  

I'm not talking about absorption

2017-12-20 00:35:01 UTC  

I guess the Bitcoin code could be changed so that more Bitcoin is created, and those new Bitcoin could be split up and redistributed to the holders of the coin being "absorbed", and the one getting absorbed could subsequently be deleted.

2017-12-20 00:35:06 UTC  

oh okay

2017-12-20 00:35:19 UTC  

I'm talking about computing power

2017-12-20 00:36:11 UTC  

It sounds to me like it's either bullshit or overblown

2017-12-20 00:37:17 UTC  

It's not like Bitcoin transactions just hijack power from unsuspecting bystanders, the computers on the network have to supply that power