Are you talking about my Example I made "Mercyism" as a mock example?

😐 me when no mercy speaks

Ah yes mercyism would you like to join <:KEK:795742276549607456>

Would you like to join our religion and worship our lord and savior "Mercy"

<:dogekek:726878872607653918> me when Titanicus speaks

Please keep in mind I am arguing with 3 people at once, m'kay? Wait your turn.

3?

@Mercy I'll be back in a bit, there's something a tad more interesting that I want to do right now, then bully you with three other people.

oh bully away

you know what happens when someone hits my "go all in button"

Oh no, have fun, I ain't touching this argument with a ten foot pole

😐

Man I was gonna go watch a movie but looks like I'm going be reading this chat <:LeoDecaprio:768140752525852742>

I agree

Please do so

Jq ?

Jewish question???

I do find it interesting that you go to a strawman, and insist its my strawman Peak. please, tell me, when did I say that ALL the scientific community supports darwins view of black people?

A good try to slide in a strawman while saying it is mine but really? That wont work on me.

What is your point here? Science isn’t consistent. It is a process, not a cult.

Jq ? @Peak Centrism

Oh no, Its not consistent, yet at the same time a certain group of people, athiests, who criticize christians with "You cant trust the bible, its unreliable and changes a lot." while at the same time science took 5 years to figure out how a bee flys because it violated standard arodynamics was infalible.

Science supported flat earth theory, that earth was the center of the solar system and lets not forget the spontanious genisis theory evolution held. "maggots and mold are evolving from this dead meat. I covered the pot with a cloth so im right!"

Dont pretend science is infalible. Heck pluto was a planet at one time and taught to people all across the world.

If you accept your own falibility but lord anothers infalibility over them for daringto beleive in something else, your a hypocrit.

Also, I pointed this out already

Science isn’t a cult

Theories are revised and reviewed all the time

They disagree on things

It’s not organized, either

And the fact Titanicus thinks I actually started a religeon in my example why you cant trust the leader of mormanism so I made and example with "Mercyism" to mock the mormanism title is so funny to me I still cant take him seriously.

I was scanning chat you dimwit

"not a good look Mercy"

Peak said that

Not me

what an arrogant assumption

And based on a scripture, that’s where it falls short. Christianity, for example, is given the book, and Christians spend time picking out evidence to support it. Science, on the other hand, has evidence that is then used to create theories, it’s trying to reach a conclusion.

How do you KNOW what they do or do not know?

Have you trancended philosophy?

That isnt a beleif, thats swinging where ever the wind blows.

OH ho ho has it?