Every system will have a group of men who are left out of reproduction, and will be willing to engage in revolution to overthrow the stagnation that prevents them from reproducing themselves.

>democratic work places

keep in mind res publica just means "public affair" and the sovereignty is based on the commonwealth rather than monarch

@Daemon Knight That is just bioleninism

This is why monogamy was so important.

yes workers should have a degree of control over their own economic affairs

guilds/coops

they know more about that than politics

"A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon." And a man will die for a woman.

you have control by a pyriamid hirearchy based on a ratio of seniority(time with the job) and ability(manifest skill in field)

Did any of you reinvite the greek nietzchean guy

no u have control by stockholders

rich faggots with zero reason to care about the nation

You don't need the people who haul boxes voting on how much the steel should cost in your bulk export deal with Germany

worker ownership at least ensures they wont close their own factory down to sell the jobs to china

thats not the shit they vote on

it would still be a representative system

you don't need worker ownership for that

you can just force them not to outsource

yes but this is about cohesion

Tariffs are back in style

Capitalists should not be allowed to grow past the middle class imo

^

Also a democratic work place would fall apart as much as a democratic government, they would vote for more gibs, less hours, higher pay, and more control to charismatic sociopaths

indeed

thats only if ur doing it based off of wage labor

how would this work

stock is better compensation tbh

Oh god... a democratic workplace where everyone is paid off comission, is this like an ancap dystopia?

you are your own shareholder

its just called a cooperative bro

But common guy doesn't understand let alone care about shares or stocks

Progressive taxation

shares are just % ownership of the company dude

and votes to elect the board of directors

Not letting them reach a certain percentage of GDP.

Why though

I mean ideally I'd agree that we shouldn't have people with the wealth of countries

Because they take advantage of the protections given to them by the warrior caste.

because having a strong bourgeoisie gives them unnecessary amounts of power

^