Messsage from Deleted User in Nick Fuentes Server #history-server

Deleted User 2018-03-21 01:06:08  

Best of all it's a realistic goal

Deleted User 2018-03-21 01:06:29  

There's no larpy "rise up!" message

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:07:07  

oh and btw all this crossing the rubicon stuff is not good optics, we should n't advocate for it at all, just a prediction about the future

Deleted User 2018-03-21 01:07:51  

I gotcha it's not an unreasonable prediction

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:09:28  

yeah its not unreasonable to say that our current situation is not tenable, but le read siege is terrible, nobody should want a real civil war

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:09:35  

it would not go as you think

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:09:43  

we would just get invaded

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:09:52  

the end

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:10:33  

if one did start then maybe events would transpire as i described as a way to end it as quick as possible

Deleted User 2018-03-21 01:10:58  

Even if the balance of power were even it would be horrible

Deleted User 2018-03-21 01:11:43  

It may even be worst. If an actual war with modern weapons was waged in America the infrastructure would be destroyed

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:11:54  

there would be no balance of power if a real open civil war started russia or china would just invade pretty quickly

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:12:31  

oof well we just shitted up history chat

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:12:40  

back to history

Deleted User 2018-03-21 01:13:57  

Would you have supported Caesar in the civil war with Pompey?

NickTheGreek 2018-03-21 01:14:11  


Huge Brain Oliver 2018-03-21 01:47:09  

The main thing is stop our New Rome sinking to the step that we have to choose between Caesar and Pompey

Huge Brain Oliver 2018-03-21 01:47:32  

SPQR is already dead in the era of trilogy

Deleted User 2018-03-21 02:55:57  

@Deleted User depends on what you mean democracy

Deleted User 2018-03-21 02:56:14  

do you mean very limited suffrage, i.e., only a small portion of the people get to make the decisions?

Deleted User 2018-03-21 03:14:33  

I asked the question because I wanted to know if there is a republican form of government without any type suffrage

Deleted User 2018-03-21 03:15:01  

Or if all republics have some degree of democracy

Thomas 2018-03-21 03:15:06  

The closest you can get to that is what we originally had.

Thomas 2018-03-21 03:15:21  

White male landowners who had actual stock in the country they were voting to rule.

Thomas 2018-03-21 03:15:31  


Thomas 2018-03-21 03:15:37  

do what the Holy Roman empire did,

Thomas 2018-03-21 03:15:43  

except on a much larger scale,

Thomas 2018-03-21 03:15:53  

have inheritated positions of power which are capable of voting.

Deleted User 2018-03-21 03:17:17  

I'm asking more of a question about definition

Deleted User 2018-03-21 03:17:29  

is it possible for a republic to not have suffrage

Thomas 2018-03-21 03:17:42  

It is not.

Deleted User 2018-03-21 03:17:45  

or would it just be an oligarchy or aristocracy

Deleted User 2018-03-21 03:17:51  


Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:08:03  

@Hektor#9849 well how do you have a legitimate transition of power

Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:08:12  

without any form of suffrage or hereditary right

Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:08:18  

trial by combat

Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:08:38  

There's a lot of nascent republics that don't have any democracy

Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:08:44  

but that seems like a transition period

Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:09:18  

i.e., the English Protectorate, the French Directory

Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:09:42  

@Hektor and even if the leader isn't elected in a republic, the legislature almost always is

Deleted User 2018-03-21 04:09:48  

@Hektor#9849 Why can't I ping you?