Good stuff @Deleted User I just got done reading a passage from Plato's Apology

Socrates innocent

https://www.amazon.com/School-Darkness-B-V-Dodd/dp/0815968043

I can send you a pdf of it if you want big guy @Nicholas J Fuentes

this is ultimately how the infiltrators were able to pull off Vatican II

crazy times we live in

Socrates deserved to die

Possibly a hot take?

What is this Socrates nigga talking about

Euthyphro seems like a smol brain

Socrates is just tossing him around

So he was just shitposting?

That's all socrates does in Euthyphro. He uses irony and just questions Euthyphro without giving his own opinion.

We gotta learn Latin fellas

People are reading Aleksandr Dugin

If i could give one book to red pill my normie liberal mom what you suggest?

siege

Im thinking the death of the west or the bell curve

death of the west

bell curve is really good

no real refutation to it

go to the goodreads reviews

@Deleted User of which book?

Also do you guys know of any good books similar to dale carnegies?

bell curve

@Deleted User

@Deleted User and?

that is where all the refutations are

@Deleted User and they're all terrible

Nothing but progressive griping that totally misses the point

but it's gross and racist

And can be disproven with research that has been conducted since the publishing of the bell curve

bad science!

i.e., if you task computers to sort individuals into populations that maximize in-group similarity and minimize out-group similarity, you get standard racial classifications

that many phenotypic clusters are associated with race

that the whole idea that race is about skin color

Nobody hates niggers because they have black skin.

"1) They rely on traditional racial categories, but American definitions of “black” and “white” are social categories based on appearance, not genetics. The One Drop Rule is an American cultural custom, not a genetic finding." -- Different populations have different phenotypic clusters. As with all distinct populations, many phenotypes are associated with other phenotypes.

"2) They insist that IQ testing proves blacks are genetically less intelligent, yet the study was vague in its assertion of which exact gene makes black Americans less intelligent. There was no examination of people with Sub-Saharan African heritage living outside of the United States." -- Because those results are even more abysmal. i.e., 10% of Sub-Saharan blacks have IQs under 50, that there are less Sub-Saharan blacks in the entirety of Africa with IQs over 100 than there are white Americans with IQs over 115+

"3) They insist that IQ is a definitive measure of intelligence, yet IQ testing has been proven to be severely culturally biased - our ancestors would have done very poorly." -- And yet it seems that most Eurasians and even some Latinos can adapt to the test best able to measure g factor, aka innate intelligence, and Africans seem most poorly equipped to handle abstract reasoning because "it's dey culcha". Not a winning refutation.