What material proof would you like to see?

>Failing to handle the proof

>computers can interpret if a god exists or not

>can't even handle 4chan servers

Choose one

Well according to him God is inherently illogical so we can't prove him with logic therefor we should all be atheists.

>Neckbead simplicity

It is logic gawdXD

I said "likely". And you know that isn't the core of the argument.

God is likely illogical?

It was the 'arguement' that you put forward.

Based on what ?

Keep calling people names if it makes you feel better man, you just display your own immaturity.

Kek

Rin, I'm not calling names - try answering me? Or is calling out an ad hominem the best you can do?

>becomes rabid wolf

>Tells me I need to stop name calling
>Name calls

>Ad hominem
That is only if reason is not used concurrently

Making the observation that you are immature isn't name calling.

Well I never called you a neckbeard

>continues to ignore my follow-up questions

I make the observation that you are a cunt

^ not ad hominem

>typing

>Still typing

Sorry man, I'm not ignoring you, just trying to deal with all of it at once and simultaniously trying to get out the door. I have to drive to the other end of the state tonight for family.

>>>>>>€

WOOOOO

sure ya do

Have fun with the fam

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

have fun with the fam

Have fun with the fam

If they're atheists they'll burn in hell

No worries, mate, I look forward to you eventually addressing my questions. Perhaps when you return

@Akulakhan I dont have any problem with god, just with the proof. You can attack the premises so it isnt an argument without holes. I lean to believing there may be something of a god

Have fun with the fam

have fun with the fam.

Have fun with the fam