America has always allowed such groups to exist (Under White rule)
Those countries rules are relatively stable and we could adapt to them.
America could rapidly change in its rules, just as it has in its demographics.

(Sorry, had to answer the door)

And I can agree to some of these countries being corrupt, or even most of them. But I was just wondering if we had people scouting them out as potential colonies.

"America has always allowed such groups to exist (Under White rule)" And you think its a good idea to move to a country that doesnt have white rule as it is? this makes no sense what so ever

I'm thinking from a more longterm perspective.

and theyre not that stable, the US is far more stable by comparison

If nothing happens and nonwhites aren't deported in the next 2 decades for example

whats your point, in the long term the US will still likely be a better place to live than most of the rest of the world, Brazil or Thailand aren't going to magically become white and not corrupt in the long term

deported from where?

Deported from the USA. They will just outbreed us until there's no money left. And then the SHTF.

Nobody is getting deported, I dont have high hopes for the futre of the US, but saying that whites are getting deported in the next 20 years is completely nonsensical and paranoid

All I am asking is your opinion one whether or not you think it's a good idea to have a colony within another region that may not be the best place to live, but at least it won't swing from what the USA was to a 3rd world country in a very short amount of time.

I don't think Whites will be deported. I think they will crack down on us hard though. Homeschooling will be illegal and white communities could be banned (they already kind of are).

Mass brainwashing will ramp up.

Racial taxation, etc

No country will be better off than they US 20 years from now, maybe with the exception of a few very white nothern ones like Canada or Iceland

And we know the direction theyre going

>starting a white ethno state
>Africa

Most of those poorer countries already have absurd population densities, and already have rebels and militias wandering the countryside, murdering and stealing from farmers

that sounds terrible, there would be no security guaranteed and i'd imagine the governments there would bully us

yeah not to mention bandits

Yeah you have to be pretty damned brave to start a new colony in Africa.

Well, I would suggest doing research on other regions every 5 years or something like that. The entire world is pretty volatile right now and things could change. When nonwhites have control of the nukes in the West, we shouldn't have already taken the option of having a colonies in the southern hemisphere off the table.

Either way, thanks for the back and forth. I appreciate it.

sure thing

Building in Africa is a bad idea... because it would be awesome and nogs would nog it up and want in on it.

Thailand is also a bad idea

You wouldn't get enough people to come and stay to maintain a pure bloodline

Southern Brazil is a slightly better idea (I was born in Northeastern Brazil)

and places like thailand simply do not have good land that isnt already occupied by lots of brown people

there's a LOT of pure europeans in the southernmost two or 3 states

and the weather is really good

and the people are awesome, and very beautful

Patagonia is an option

Patagonia is good if you don't mind the occasional earthquake, but it lacks big game

and a stable European population

We'd have a hard time getting people over there, and having them stay there

PNW is our only option, and there's also Appalachia

Say what you will about the current state of politics, at the end of the day America is still the only country with 112 guns per capita

and that means alot

yeah it really does